- 215

- 11

I'm working on an assignment due next Thursday and I'm having a little bit of difficulty on two problems that seemed surprisingly easy on the surface. My difficulty lies primarily in making sure I understand what the problems are asking. Here are the problems and I'll detail my idea without solving them completely.

"Using the following dispersion relation for Rossby waves:

$$c = \overline{u} - \frac{\beta}{(k^{2} + l^{2})}$$

calculate the phase speed of Rossby waves relative to the basic flow for waves moving around altitude 30° with a 10,000 km wavelength and a 3,000 km latitudinal width (approximately a 6,000 km wavelength)." (from Houghton, 2nd Edition, Chapter 8, Problem 12)

Depending on your familiarity with the subject you might find this page useful in providing hints to me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossby_wave#Free_barotropic_Rossby_waves_under_a_zonal_flow_with_linearized_vorticity_equation

So I'm having a few problems with this problem. First, I'm not quite sure what it means by "latitudinal width" - I've searched this term on google and looked it up in the appendix of my text (Atmospheric Science 2nd Edition by Wallace & Hobbs) but couldn't find it mentioned. In the formula given in the problem k and l are wavenumbers, with ##k = \frac{2\pi}{10,000}## and ##l = \frac{2pi}{6,000}##. Initially I was trying to solve for c which meant I needed an expression for ##\overline{u}## (I considered using geostrophic balance to find this) but decided that because the question asks for the phase speed relative to the basic flow it made more sense to compute the value ##c - \overline{u}##.

My second problem is as follows:

"Using the dispersion relation from Problem (1) [above], calculate the zonal wind under which a Rossby wave pattern at 60°N of wavenumber 3 (ie. 3 maxima around a circle of longitude) and latitudinal width of 3,000 km would be stationary with respect to the Earth's surface." (from Houghton, 2nd Edition, Chapter 8, Problem 13)

For this problem I thought I would have to set ##c = 0## and then solve for ##\overline{u}## using ##k = 3## and l as in my first problem (##l = \frac{2\pi}{3,000}##). However, because k >> l we can ignore l completely in this calculation. However, this large value for k seems almost unphysical to me.

Thank you very much in advance for any feedback you can provide with respect to an approach to either of these problems.

"Using the following dispersion relation for Rossby waves:

$$c = \overline{u} - \frac{\beta}{(k^{2} + l^{2})}$$

calculate the phase speed of Rossby waves relative to the basic flow for waves moving around altitude 30° with a 10,000 km wavelength and a 3,000 km latitudinal width (approximately a 6,000 km wavelength)." (from Houghton, 2nd Edition, Chapter 8, Problem 12)

Depending on your familiarity with the subject you might find this page useful in providing hints to me: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossby_wave#Free_barotropic_Rossby_waves_under_a_zonal_flow_with_linearized_vorticity_equation

So I'm having a few problems with this problem. First, I'm not quite sure what it means by "latitudinal width" - I've searched this term on google and looked it up in the appendix of my text (Atmospheric Science 2nd Edition by Wallace & Hobbs) but couldn't find it mentioned. In the formula given in the problem k and l are wavenumbers, with ##k = \frac{2\pi}{10,000}## and ##l = \frac{2pi}{6,000}##. Initially I was trying to solve for c which meant I needed an expression for ##\overline{u}## (I considered using geostrophic balance to find this) but decided that because the question asks for the phase speed relative to the basic flow it made more sense to compute the value ##c - \overline{u}##.

**Does this seem like a reasonable way to approach this problem?**My second problem is as follows:

"Using the dispersion relation from Problem (1) [above], calculate the zonal wind under which a Rossby wave pattern at 60°N of wavenumber 3 (ie. 3 maxima around a circle of longitude) and latitudinal width of 3,000 km would be stationary with respect to the Earth's surface." (from Houghton, 2nd Edition, Chapter 8, Problem 13)

For this problem I thought I would have to set ##c = 0## and then solve for ##\overline{u}## using ##k = 3## and l as in my first problem (##l = \frac{2\pi}{3,000}##). However, because k >> l we can ignore l completely in this calculation. However, this large value for k seems almost unphysical to me.

**Does this seem a reasonable approach?**Thank you very much in advance for any feedback you can provide with respect to an approach to either of these problems.

Last edited: