Phasor Diagrams in single phase series circuits

AI Thread Summary
In single-phase series circuits, it is common to draw the current along the x-axis with voltage phasors represented relative to it. For resistive components, the voltage is in phase with the current, while in inductive and capacitive circuits, the voltage lags or leads the current by 90 degrees, respectively. The choice of reference phasor can vary, but it is often practical to use voltage as the reference. The current remains consistent across all components in a series circuit, but the phase of the voltage will differ based on the type of component. Ultimately, both methods of representation are acceptable, depending on the context of the problem.
Physicist3
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
In single phase series circuits, should the current always be drawn along the x-axis and the voltage then drawn with respect to it? E.g. Should Vr be drawn in line with I, VL leading by 90 degrees (pointing upwards) and Vc lagging by 90 (Pointing down)? The reason I ask is because I've seen some diagrams for a purely capacitive circuit where the voltage is along the x-axis and the current is pointing upwards? but I always thought you drew the diagrams with the common factor on the horizontal?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the sinusoidal voltage is given to you in the form
v(t)=V_msin({\omega}t+\phi)
then when you represent it on the phasor diagram, it has that angle(\phi) with respect to the positive, real axis. If all you know is the current leads/lags the voltage, then set one of the phasors as your reference, and the other phasor will either lead or lag that phasor depending on the orientation that you went with. I usually have voltage as my reference, and if the current lags (purely inductive), then the current phasor will be -90 degrees from the reference voltage phasor. If it leads in a purely capacitive network, the opposite is true.
For example, V_{RMS}e^{j0} and I_{RMS}e^{-j90} is the same as V_{RMS}e^{j90} with I_{RMS}e^{j0} because ultimately the phasor is rotating counterclockwise about the origin, at 90 degrees with respect to each other.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply. Is it acceptable to use either method as I've always been taught to work from the principle that current is same everywhere in series circuits and hence should go on the positive real axis.
 
Soon enough you'll be ambidestrous, swapping back and forth to whichever convention better suits the problem at hand.

It's just like learning language.
 
You would plot voltages on a screen that only showed voltages, not currents.

In a series circuit, if there is a resistor present, the voltage across the resistor will be in phase with the current, so this will be plotted along a horizontal line and other voltages will be plotted relative to this.

The current in all components of a series circuit is the same, but the phase of the voltage will vary depending on the component.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top