Solving Equation for M & P - Geometry Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoyo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation 5*cos(Wo*t)=M*cos(Wo*t-(pi/6))+5*cos(Wo*t+p) for variables M and P using the phasor method. A geometrical diagram in the z-plane is suggested to visualize the solutions, specifically focusing on the set defined by {z:z=5*exp(j*p)-5 where 0≤p≤2pi}. The user encountered an issue when converting to phasor form, resulting in M=0, which raises questions about its implications. The response indicates that substituting M=0 back into the original equation can help determine the corresponding value of P. This exchange highlights the importance of graphical representation and substitution in solving complex equations in geometry.
yoyo
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi i am trying to solve this problem and i am stuck at finding all possible solutions, can someone please help?

Problem: Solve the following equation for M and P. Obtain all possible answers. Use the phasor method, and provide a geometrica diagram to explain the answers.

5*cos(Wo*t)=M*cos(Wo*t-(pi/6))+5*cos(Wo*t+p)
hint: Describe the figure in the z-plane given by the set {z:z=5*exp(j*p)-5 where 0<(or equal) p <(or equal) 2pi

when i converted to phasor form and solve for M, I got M=0, not sure what that means...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if you insert M=0 in the original equation, you can immediately see what p would be.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top