Phenol Dissociation: O-H Bond Weaker?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dissociation of phenol and the strength of the O-H bond due to electron delocalization into the benzene ring. It is argued that the oxygen's electrons can indeed be delocalized, weakening the O-H bond and facilitating proton release. However, there is a question regarding whether the existing electron density in the benzene ring makes it difficult for additional electrons from oxygen to merge into the electron cloud. Drawing resonance structures for both phenol and the phenolate ion illustrates that the oxygen can carry a positive charge, promoting proton release, while the negative charge in the phenolate ion is delocalized onto the ring. This analysis highlights the interplay between resonance and bond strength in phenol's structure.
crays
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
Hi, my teacher told me that the oxygen in phenol would be delocalized into the benzene ring's electron and thus, making the O-H bond weaker, thus easing the release of the H proton. But i would like to know, since a benzene consist of 3 double bonds, shouldn't the electrons from the benzene itself already occupied most of the shield, thus making it harder for any other electrons to be joined in? Wouldn't the Oxygen, O's electron be repel if they try to merge into the benzene's electron cloud?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try drawing resonance structures for phenol. You'll see that in some of them, the oxygen will have a positive charge and thus want to get rid of its proton. Alternatively, if you draw resonance structures for the phenolate ion, you should see that the negative charge from the oxygen gets delocalized to carbons on the ring.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
17K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top