Photoelectric Effect: Solving a Stopping Potential Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a photoelectric effect problem from University Physics 13th Edition, where the user calculates the work function using the stopping potential and frequency of light. They derive a value of 5.17 eV, while the textbook states it as 4.8 eV. The calculations involve using Planck's constant and the elementary charge for conversions. A participant suggests that the user might be looking for the work function and notes a potential error in unit interpretation. Overall, the user seeks clarification on their calculations and the discrepancy with the textbook answer.
nichelfish
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, thanks for any help in advance. I'm working through some exercises in University Physics 13th Edition and have an issue with a photoelectric effect question.

I'm given a graph that represents stopping potential as a function of frequency of light falling onto the surface (attached is a drawing, didn't want to post a direct pic incase it went against the rules). At a stopping potential of 0, the frequency is 1.25x10^15 Hz. As in this case hf=work function (and using h=6.626x10^-34 and e as 1.602x10^-19) I get, using parenthesis to try and make it clearer:

(1.25x10^15)x(6.626x10^-34) = 8.2825x10^-19 V

Converting to eV
(8.2825x10^-19) / (1.602x10^-19) = 5.17 eV.

The answer listed in the textbook gives 4.8eV. I've tried calculations for other points along the line (larger frequencies and stopping potentials) and get the same answer.

Anybody able to hint at as to where I may be going wrong?

Thanks in advance for any help.
 

Attachments

  • 1388496361858.jpg
    1388496361858.jpg
    17.8 KB · Views: 539
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. Could you tell me what are you trying to find in particular? I'm guessing you're trying to find the work function for the particular metal. If that's the case, I don't see any error on your part.
 
Other than your 1st eq. rt-hand-side should be J, not V, I see no error either.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top