Photons - Trying to find distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nitric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the distance from which the naked eye can detect a 60-W lightbulb, given that the eye can detect as few as five photons per second. Participants emphasize the need to determine the number of photons emitted by the bulb and how they disperse in space, forming an imaginary sphere around the light source. The conversation highlights the importance of using the energy of the bulb and the energy of individual photons to find the relevant formulas. By applying the known detection threshold of five photons per second, one can derive the distance by manipulating the equations related to photon emission and detection. This approach illustrates a common physics problem-solving technique involving assumptions and calculations to find unknown variables.
Nitric
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. The night-adapted eye can detect as few as several photons per second -- say five to be definite. Assuming that the pupil of the eye is 0.6 cm in diameter, from what distance would it be possible for the naked eye to detect a 60-W lightbulb?



2. I'm not sure which equation to use. In the section where the problem is from, I get teh follow equations (which don't help me)
E=pc, E=hf, h=6.63x10^-34, p=h/lamda




3. Not sure which formula to use
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you will need to know how many photons the light emits per second. You can do this by picking a frequency near the low end of the visible range (to end up with the minimum), and using the energy of the bulb and the energy of the photon. Guess or look up the energy efficiency of a light bulb.

The next thing is how the photons from the bulb spread out in space. They go out in all directions equally, so light up an imaginary sphere at the distance where the eye is. The question is what portion of that lit up area is caught by the eye.
 
It says 5 photons/sec in the question.
 
Yes, you know the 5 per sec answer so you can use the expression for the # of photons hitting the eye - which has a d in it - to solve for the distance.

Physics often works that way. You pretend you know something like the distance to the source, work out other quantities based on that unknown, and when you find one you know the answer for, you can solve for the unknown. Very useful trick!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top