Breaking Causality: Physical Interpretation

In summary, the conversation discusses the relationship between different types of vectors in space-time, specifically the concept of spacelike vectors where the distance between two events is greater than the distance light can travel in the time separating them. The physical interpretation of a spacelike vector is that it represents something traveling faster than light. The conversation also touches on time-like vectors, which represent something traveling slower than light.
  • #1
watty
9
0
I understand that certain vectors in space-time (spacelike vectors) present a non-causal situation where E2 which takes place at a time after E1 in the rest frame cannot physically be a consequence in a different frame at sufficient speed. but there is also the relationship that arises from the lorentz transformations:

{ (x_2 - x_1)/c(t_2 - t_1) }

i understand the three types of vectors that arise (spacelike, timelike and lightlike) but what is the physical interpretation of a spacelike vector? simply two events where the spatial displacement is larger than the distance over which light travels in the time which separates the two events in the rest frame?

Am I along the right lines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi watty! :smile:

A time-like vector represents something traveling slower than light (in the frame of any inertial observer).

A space-like vector represents something traveling faster than light (and so, yes, "the spatial displacement is larger than the distance over which light travels in the time which separates the two events"). :wink:
 

1. What is "Breaking Causality: Physical Interpretation"?

"Breaking Causality: Physical Interpretation" is a concept in physics that refers to scenarios where an effect appears to occur before its cause. This goes against the commonly accepted principle that cause must always come before effect, and has been a topic of much debate and research in the scientific community.

2. How can causality be broken in physics?

There are several proposed mechanisms for breaking causality in physics, including the use of tachyons (hypothetical particles that can travel faster than the speed of light), wormholes (hypothetical tunnels through space-time), and quantum entanglement (a phenomenon where particles can become correlated regardless of distance). However, these mechanisms are still largely theoretical and have not been proven to actually break causality.

3. What are the implications of breaking causality in physics?

If causality were to be broken in physics, it would have major implications for our understanding of the universe and the laws that govern it. It could potentially allow for time travel and the violation of other fundamental physical principles, leading to a complete rethinking of our current theories and models.

4. Is there evidence of causality being broken in the real world?

Currently, there is no conclusive evidence of causality being broken in the real world. While there have been some experiments that have seemingly shown effects occurring before their supposed causes, these results are often controversial and have not been replicated consistently.

5. What are some criticisms of the concept of breaking causality in physics?

One major criticism of breaking causality is that it goes against our everyday experiences and common sense. The idea that an effect can occur before its cause is counterintuitive and goes against our understanding of how the world works. Additionally, many scientists argue that the laws of physics, including causality, have been consistently supported by experiments and observations and should not be questioned without solid evidence.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
783
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
123
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
302
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
10K
Back
Top