Physics 2 question velocity of electrons and voltages

AI Thread Summary
To determine the potential difference required to accelerate an electron from 1.00×10^6 m/s to 9.90×10^6 m/s, the kinetic energy equations are applied. The initial and final kinetic energies are calculated, resulting in values of 4.55×10^-19 J and 4.45×10^-17 J, respectively. The potential difference is derived from the change in kinetic energy, leading to a calculated voltage of approximately 275.282 V, noting that the electron moves against the electric field. Clarification is sought on the relationship between voltage and kinetic energy, specifically how V=U/q0 can be expressed as V=K/q0. The discussion emphasizes that the electron gains energy through a positive potential difference, aligning with the physics of electron acceleration.
rasanders22
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Prob statement:
An electron is to be accelerated from a velocity of 1.00×10^6 m/s to a velocity of 9.90×10^6 m/s . Through what potential difference must the electron pass to accomplish this?


equations:
v=U/q0
1/2mv^2
U=K (this is where I have a question)

Well I already have the answer. But here's how I got it.

Ki=.5(9.11*10^-31)(1*10^6)^2=4.55*10^-19J
Kf=.5(9.11*10^-31)(9.9*10^6)^2=4.45*10^-17J

Vi=Ki/(-1.6*10^-19)=-2.843V
Vf=Kf/(-1.6*10^-19)=-278.125V

V=Vi-Vf=275.282V But the voltage is negative because the electron is flowing against the + to - field (atleast how i explained it to myself)

Well my first question is how does V=U/q0 turn into V=K/q0. I found one example where my instructor used this to determine the voltage but I can't find any reference to it in my book.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what your Vi and Vf business is all about. Basically you want to add a certain amount of KE to what the electron already has (your Ki). So you have a desired ∆KE which is Kf - Ki.

The electron will gain energy falling through a potential difference: ∆KE = -q∆V. Since the required energy gain is positive in this case, and since q is negative, then ∆V should be a positive potential change (the electron should be accelerated by a positive potential).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top