Classical Physics book with explanations instead of definitions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a student seeking a more approachable physics textbook, as their current resource, "Physics for Scientists and Engineers: A Strategic Approach" by Knight, feels overly formal. The student is looking for a book that explains concepts in a friendlier manner while still providing the depth necessary for college-level understanding, particularly in electromagnetism and flux. Suggestions include the Feynman Lectures, which are available online and are praised for their engaging style. The conversation emphasizes the importance of finding accessible educational resources that still meet academic requirements.
Cole
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I am taking my third term of physics right now, and we are talking about flux at the moment. This terms is supposed to be a lot about E&M.

Though I find that our textbook (Physics for scientists and engineers a strategic approach 4/e) is very textbooky. I was wondering if there is such thing as a physics book that is written less formally and would be written more like a friend was explaining the concepts to me instead of a dictionary. But it would of course also have to do into the depth I need in order to do well in a college class.

Does such a thing exist? The closes thing I have found is khan academy, but they don't have videos on everything we are talking about.

Let me know if you have any suggestions!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tip: most people refer to physics and math textbooks by the name(s) of their author(s) because the titles are so similar. You're using Knight's book, right? (a fairly well known calculus-based first-year university intro physics book)

You might look at the Feynman lectures, which are (legally) available online:

http://www.feynmanlectures.info/

Click on "Read" in the menu at the left side of the page.
 
  • Like
Likes Cole and smodak
jtbell said:
Tip: most people refer to physics and math textbooks by the name(s) of their author(s) because the titles are so similar. You're using Knight's book, right? (a fairly well known calculus-based first-year university intro physics book)

You might look at the Feynman lectures, which are (legally) available online:

http://www.feynmanlectures.info/

Click on "Read" in the menu at the left side of the page.
Wow thank you this looks really helpful!
 
jtbell said:
Tip: most people refer to physics and math textbooks by the name(s) of their author(s) because the titles are so similar. You're using Knight's book, right? (a fairly well known calculus-based first-year university intro physics book)

You might look at the Feynman lectures, which are (legally) available online:

http://www.feynmanlectures.info/

Click on "Read" in the menu at the left side of the page.
And yes you're right this is Knight's book.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top