Physics: conservation of energy and springs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving two children using a spring-loaded gun to hit a target box with a marble. Bobby's attempt falls short, prompting the need to determine how much Rhonda should compress the spring for a successful hit. Key concepts include the conservation of energy, where the potential energy stored in the spring is converted to kinetic energy of the marble, and the kinematic equations for projectile motion. The time of flight is constant due to the height from which the marble falls, meaning the horizontal distance traveled is directly related to the marble's horizontal speed. The conclusion emphasizes using conservation of energy and projectile motion equations to solve for the required spring compression.
InFiNiTeX
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Two children are playing a game in which they try to hit a small box on the floor with a marble fired from a spring-loaded gun that is mounted on a table. The target box is 2.20m horizontally from the edge of the table. Bobby compresses the spring 1.10cm, but the center of the marble falls 27.0cm short of the center of the box. How far should Rhonda compress the spring to score a direct hit? Assume that neither the spring nor the ball encounters friction in the gun.

i know i use conservation of energy and X=vt+(1/2)Axt^2 and Y=Voy(t)+(1/2)Ayt^2 and i think you solve for both... but after that i don't know what to do... am i using the right equations? the answer is 1.25cm
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Realize that the time it takes for the marble to fall depends only on the height so is a constant. Thus the horizontal distance the marble travels is proportional to its horizontal speed. Now relate the horizontal speed to the amount of spring compression using conservation of energy: 1/2 k x^2 = 1/2 m v^2. Use ratios.
 
i do not really understand... i was told i would most probably use conservation of energy and the 2d motion equations.. is that the same as what you explained?
 
Realize that there are usually several ways--all equivalent--to solve these kinds of problem. I don't know what you mean by "2d motion equations"; I assume you mean the kinematic equations you wrote? If so, realize that only the vertical motion is accelerated; the horizontal speed remains constant.

Bottom line: Yes, use conservation of energy and kinematics of projectiles.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top