Physics Lab: Negative Energy Loss on Roller-Coaster Track

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics lab analyzing energy conservation in a roller-coaster track experiment. Participants note that negative energy loss can arise from kinetic and rolling friction, which transforms mechanical energy into heat and sound, resulting in an approximate 5% energy loss. Additionally, experimental errors may contribute to perceived energy gains, leading to confusion about the data. The conversation emphasizes that energy cannot be lost but is transformed into different forms, and accurate data collection is crucial for reliable results. Overall, the findings highlight the complexities of real-world physics versus ideal conditions.
bhatnv
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We recently did a lab in my physics class where we looked at the conservation of energy of a ball on a roller-coaster track.

We got the data as seen in the picture below
http://tinypic.com/r/168zx2s/7

the question now is why is there negative energy loss, is this energy loss neglible or is there a reason for it?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


only real thing i could think that could cause this is imprecise data, but i doubt that to be the case
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The loss is due to kinetic and rolling friction. On an ideal frictionless track, there would be no loss in mechanical energy (and neither would the ball roll, it would slide). But in the real world, frictionless surfaces do not exist, so there will always be some energy loss due to the work done by friction, such losses showing up mostly as heat and sound energy (energy cannot ever be lost, rather, it is just transformed to different forms). In your case, the loss in mechanical energy is about 5%, which shows up as heat and sound energy, mostly.
Edit: some of the loss may also be due to experimental error
 
Last edited:
i understand that part, but my main concern is why is there an increase in energy or in other terms negative energy loss
 
Oh, I see there are a few instances at the beginning where energy is gained. Ideally, the initial mechanical energy of 0.0999 should be the total energy throughout the trip. Friction, in the general form of heat and sound energy, cause mechanical energy losses, and experimental error (there must be some) can also cause apparent losses. Mechanical energy is gained if energy is added to the system (maybe you blew on it?), or, more likely, it is due to experimental error. Is your data actually accurate to 4 significant figures?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top