Physics of Dry Air: Is a Space Heater Drying the Air?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hmmmm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Physics
AI Thread Summary
Using a space heater can create the perception of dry air because heating increases the air's capacity to hold moisture, thus lowering relative humidity. While the heater does not remove water vapor, the warmer air can feel drier. The actual drying effect in winter is primarily due to cold outdoor temperatures, which reduce indoor humidity levels. Therefore, while a space heater does not dehumidify, it can contribute to a drier feeling environment. Understanding these dynamics can help manage indoor air quality effectively.
hmmmm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am using a space heater (fan plus heater type thing) to heat a room and was wondering if this drys the air, because it sure seems to. As I understand it, dehumidifiers use a cold element to condense water out of the air, which is obviously different from the fan and heating element that makes up my space heater. Does anyone know what happens to water molecules when they pass through a space heater? Am I drying the air by using it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In absolute terms, heating air does not dry it - it does not actually remove any water vapor from the air. But the relative humidity goes down as temperature goes up because air has a greater capacity to hold water the warmer it is. What really makes the air inside dry in the winter is that it is cold outside.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top