Physics parallel circut question ( Test Exam)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on estimating the current through R2 in a circuit involving six identical LEDs, with a maximum voltage drop of 3V across each LED. Participants emphasize that without the I-V function, only an estimate can be made. Key assumptions include ensuring sufficient current for normal LED operation while avoiding overheating. The approach involves analyzing the voltage drop across each LED and R2 to calculate the current. The conversation highlights the importance of simple calculations for practical applications, especially in DIY electronics projects.
lazyboy92
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Physics parallel circut question ! ( Test Exam) "URGENT"


Here is the image http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/606/physexam.jpg"

The image is slightly blury, however still readable!

IF YOU ARE UNSURE OF WHAT THE IMAGE READS...

the following information relates to question 4 and 5

Richard is conducting an experiment with a number on light emmiting diods (LEDs).
The I-V characteristics are shown in figure 3.






Question 4
Richard sets up a circut involving 6 identical LEDs as shown in figure 4




What is the value of the current through R2









I ALSO NEED ANY OTHER ANSWERS THIS QUESTION YIELDS




many THANKS :-)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


You know you can't have any potential drop across the LEDs that's more than 3V each. You won't be able to get the exact current without knowing the IV function, just an estimate.
 


Mindscrape said:
You know you can't have any potential drop across the LEDs that's more than 3V each. You won't be able to get the exact current without knowing the IV function, just an estimate.

Yeh i just need an estimate and any other answers this question has
 


Mindscrape said:
You know you can't have any potential drop across the LEDs that's more than 3V each. You won't be able to get the exact current without knowing the IV function, just an estimate.

the iv characteristics are shown in figure 3 the graph
 


As Mindscrape points out, finding the current in this problem is just an estimate. But as it turns out, you can get a really, pretty good estimate, just by keeping things simple.

Problems such as this one have real world applications. If you're ever going to breadboard LEDs to light up in a simple circuit as part of a (simple) fun project, simple calculations like these are generally all that is necessary.

Look at the IV curve that you have attached. It's acceptable to make the following assumptions:
(I) There's current going through each LED -- enough current such that the LED is in its normal operating range. In other words, there is at least enough current going through the LED such that it does what it was designed to do (i.e. light up).
(II) There is not too much current going through the LED such that it overheats, blows-up, etc.

With the above assumptions in mind, look at your attached IV curve and ask yourself,

(1) What is the voltage drop across each LED?

After that, analyze the circuit and ask yourself,

(2) What is the voltage drop across R2?

With that, you should be able to calculate the current through R2.

As a final step, it is usually a good idea to perform a sanity check. From your above results, calculate the current flowing in any given LED. Eye-ball your attached IV curve once again, and see if the resulting voltage is fairly close to (ball-park figure) your estimate in (1).
 


As I said before, you know the most voltage that the LED's can drop will be 3V each for a total of 9V. Do a KVL and you will know how much voltage is dropped across the resistor, and you can then get an upper limit on the current going through the resistor. Seeing as how this was "urgent," you're probably past this question by now, but if you come back and look this will tell you how it's done. In the future, post some thoughts and work. ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top