Physics recoil/friction problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mindadiann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a skier who fires a gun while skiing down a hill. Key points include the need for conservation of momentum and energy principles to analyze the situation, but participants note that critical information, such as the skier's mass and the slope of the ski track, is missing. The skier's mass is stated to be 7500 times that of the bullet, which is a .30-06 with a muzzle velocity of 835 m/s. To solve the problem, the initial velocity at the bottom of the hill and the velocity after firing the bullet must be calculated, with emphasis on using conservation laws. Overall, the problem is deemed incomplete without additional data to determine the coefficient of friction.
mindadiann
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can Anybody Help me with this physics problem?
A skiier stars from rest at the top of the hill. As he skiies down the hill he fires a 30-06 with a uzzle velocity of 835m/s ata the bottom of the valley in the direction of motion. He has just enough energy to reach the top of the second hill(8.74 m lower than the first) and come to a stop. The distance he travels is 100m. What is the coefficient of friction of the snow?

I don't need an answers, but if anybody has seen a problem like this could you tell me the first step or equation that I would use
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's a 30-06?
 
its a gun....the bullet has a velocity of 835 m/s
 
mindadiann said:
its a gun....the bullet has a velocity of 835 m/s

Right, it's a thirty-aught-six. This a conservation of momentum and energy problem. But there's not nearly enough information given there to solve it. You'll need the mass of the skier and the mass of the projectile at least. Then I think you can get a force of friction. But to get a coefficient of friction, I think you'll also need the slope of the ski track. It doesn't look like a complete problem to me.
 
the mass of the skiier is 7500 times the mass of the bullet. but this is a complete problem. please help?
 
mindadiann said:
the mass of the skiier is 7500 times the mass of the bullet. but this is a complete problem. please help?

Start trying to solve it. Say the height of the first hill is h and the skier's mass is m. If you ignore friction what's the velocity of the skier at the bottom of the hill? Use conservation of energy. How much is the velocity after the bullet is fired? Use conservation of momentum to do that. Compare that with the velocity required to climb the second hill. Doesn't stuff depend on m and h in ways that don't cancel out?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top