Pigs in space and circular orbit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two particles, referred to as pigs, in uniform circular motion influenced by an attractive force. The objective is to demonstrate that the separation distance R between the pigs is given by the formula R = F/(ω²)(1/m + 1/M). The user initially struggles with the concept of center of mass and the relationship between angular velocities and tangential velocities of the two masses. After analyzing the forces and accelerations acting on each mass, the user arrives at the correct formula for R, confirming their understanding of the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities of circular motion and the interplay of forces in a two-body system.
swevener
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two [STRIKE]particles[/STRIKE] pigs of mass ##m## and ##M## undergo uniform circular motion about each other at a separation of ##R## under the influence of an attractive force ##F##. The angular velocity is ##\omega## radians per second. Show that R = \frac{F}{\omega^2}\left( \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{M} \right).

Homework Equations


##F = ma##


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm having trouble reconciling my physical reasoning (which is probably wrong) with the given answer. Okay so since the pigs are orbiting each other I think that means their tangential velocities are equal. And we've got a central force ##F## keeping them a distance ##R## apart.

The book hasn't covered center of mass yet, but I don't care; I want to find the center of mass. (It's likely this is where I'm going astray, but this is what makes sense to me, so I'm going to do it and hope you'll tell me why I'm wrong.) Let's put the origin at ##M## for the time being, so the center of mass is ##mR/(m+M)## along the line connecting ##m## and ##M##. That makes the distance of ##m## from the center of mass ##R - mR/(m+M) = MR/(m+M)##. Now move the origin to the center of mass and define ##r_M = mR/(m+M)## and ##r_m = MR/(m+M)##, noting that if ##m = M##, ##r_m = r_M = R/2##, so that seems okay.

With respect to my possibly inconvenient origin, ##m## and ##M## have the same tangential velocity ##v## but will have different angular velocities, ##v = r_m \omega_m = r_M \omega_M##. But with respect to the midpoint between them, I think they'd have the same angular velocity ##v = (R/2) \omega##. With that relation we can get \omega_M = \frac{R}{2 r_M} \omega = \frac{m + M}{2m} \omega and \omega_m = \frac{R}{2 r_m} \omega = \frac{m + M}{2M} \omega. (Edit: Looking at this again, these equations would mean ##\omega_M \ge \omega_m##, which doesn't make sense when ##r_M \le r_m##. :frown:)

Now the accelerations. For ##M##, \mathbf{a}_M = -\frac{F}{M} \hat{r} = -r_M \omega_M^2 \hat{r} \rightarrow \frac{F}{M} - r_M \omega_M^2 = 0. For ##m##, \mathbf{a}_m = -\frac{F}{m} \hat{r} = -r_m \omega_m^2 \hat{r} \rightarrow \frac{F}{m} - r_m \omega_m^2 = 0.

Since 0 + 0 = 0, \frac{F}{M} + \frac{F}{m} - r_M \omega_M^2 - r_m \omega_m^2 = 0. At this point, if I just let ##r_M \omega_M^2 = r_m \omega_m^2 = v^2 / (R/2) = R \omega^2 / 2##, the answer pops right out. That doesn't make much sense to me, though. Why would the same force acting on two unequal masses yield the same acceleration? So I'll keep going. \begin{align}F \left( \frac{m + M}{mM} \right) &amp;= r_M \omega_M^2 + r_m \omega_m^2 \\<br /> &amp;= r_M \left( \frac{m + M}{2m} \omega \right)^2 + r_m \left( \frac{m + M}{2M} \omega \right)^2 \\<br /> \frac{F}{mM} &amp;= r_M \frac{m + M}{4m^2} \omega^2 + r_m \frac{m + M}{4M^2} \omega^2 \\<br /> &amp;= \left( \frac{mR}{m+M} \frac{m+M}{4m^2} + \frac{MR}{m+M} \frac{m+M}{4M^2} \right) \omega^2 \\<br /> &amp;= \left( \frac{1}{m} + \frac{1}{M} \right) \frac{R \omega^2}{4} \\<br /> F &amp;= \frac{R \omega^2 (m + M)}{4}.\end{align} Thus R = \frac{4F}{\omega^2 (m+M)}.So why am I wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind. I got it. (See the edit.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top