Pion Photoproduction Homework: Proton Energy Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arcturus7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pion
Arcturus7
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have been given the following problem on a homework sheet;

"The CMB has an (almost) uniform temperature of (almost) 3K. If we take the energy of a photon to be E=3kT, what minimum energy must a proton have in order to interact with a CMB photon in order to produce neutral Pi Mesons?"

Homework Equations



I've come at this problem using nothing but the definition of 4-Momenta and the Invariant Mass, plus the given equation for the photon energy.

The Attempt at a Solution



Immediately we can calculate the photon energy to be 7.76 x 10-4eV.

Initially, in the Center of Momentum frame, we have that the sum of the momenta is 0. This leaves us with;

W=EProton+EPhoton

And then after the interaction, since the resultant particles will be at rest (minimum energy is specified in the question) we can conclude that the invariant mass is just the sum of the individual masses;

W=MProton+MPion

By equating the two we conclude that;

EProton=MProton+MPion-EPhoton=1.073GeV

I've heard a lot of classmates say their answers were very different (some many many orders of magnitude larger). I can't really see a flaw in my argument, but that being said, it seems fairly simplistic. What have I missed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mix energies in different reference frames. In the center of momentum frame, the photon energy won't be 0.776 meV.

The correct answer is many, many orders of magnitude larger.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top