Planck's constant as a measure of significance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between Planck's constant and everyday human experience, suggesting that it can be viewed as a unit of significance in physics. It highlights how fundamental concepts in physics, like mass and time, are derived from common experiences. The proposal is made in a lighthearted manner, drawing parallels to literature, specifically referencing Anthony Trollope's novel, where significance plays a key role. While Planck's constant is too small to affect daily life, it serves as a measure of action on small scales. The conversation emphasizes the importance of linking scientific concepts to familiar language and experiences.
Paulibus
Messages
203
Reaction score
11
The basic concepts used in physics are mostly derived from everyday human experience.
Hardly surprising for a subject which usefully describes our contingent physical circumstances.

For example dynamics involves ordinary and familiar concepts like mass, and changing
distance is described as velocity and acceleration. Time itself may be derived from ordinary
experience, as argued vigorously in a very recent essay by arXiv:1208.2611 .

Here I propose in a lighthearted way that the physics concept of h,
Planck’s constant, be similarly linked to our ordinary usage of language. I suggest treating it
as a unit of significance. (See also Anthony Trollope’s 19th Century novel, Framley
Parsonage, where the significance of its heroine is a critical element of the story.)

On the scale of ordinary human affairs h is too small to influence our everyday behaviour, but
especially on small scales, it is used as a measure of action; a dynamic concept that is the
product of momentum and quantum wavelength. But on larger scales the product of
momentum and size is still significant — charging elephants and runaway locomotives tend to
draw one’s attention!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Closed, pending moderation.

Zz.
 
Back
Top