Plank problem/Center of Gravity/Torque/Level Arm(p.26)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gcombina
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a horizontal plank with a specified weight and the placement of a person on it, examining the conditions under which the plank will tip. The subject area includes concepts of torque, center of gravity, and equilibrium in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of torque equations and the significance of the center of mass in their calculations. There are attempts to clarify the reasoning behind using specific distances for torque calculations, with some participants questioning the initial assumptions and methods used.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of torque principles, with participants providing insights into the average distance of mass distribution along the plank. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the center of mass and its relevance to the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the specific calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There are indications of misunderstandings regarding the initial setup and calculations, which are being addressed through discussion.

gcombina
Messages
157
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A horizontal, 10-m plank weighs 100 N. It rests on two supports that are placed 1.0 m from each end as shown in the figure. How close to one end can an 800-N person stand without causing the plank to tip?
(a) 0 m (d) 0.7 m

(b) 0.3 m (e) 0.9 m

(c) 0.5 m

Homework Equations


T = Force x level arm

The Attempt at a Solution

T = F x L

mg x (center of gravity of the plank) = mg x level arm
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 ) = [ (800N)(9.8) ] ( l )

level arm = .5

My question is why do "center of mass" needs to be used?

I originally did 90N but didn't work so I had to do 4.5 for the center of mass

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • q26.png
    q26.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 2,334
Physics news on Phys.org
gcombina said:
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 ) = [ (800N)(9.8) ] ( l )
You've forgotten the rest of the plank.
gcombina said:
My question is why do "center of mass" needs to be used?
As opposed to using what? Or do you mean why is the centre of mass at 4.5?
gcombina said:
I originally did 90N but didn't work so I had to do 4.5 for the center of mass
I've no idea what you mean. How exactly did you "do" 90N?
If there's some approach you took that didn't work, please post all the working, and explain how you know it did not work.
 
because i did the torque from the left side which is 9.0 meters

I am doing the torque on the left = torque on the right

the torque on the left starts from the second fulcrum to the left

see belowI did mg x length
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 9.0 m ) = FL

And this way did NOT work

I had to change it to

[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 m ) = Fl
 
Hello and welcome back! non-Shouting contest misunderstanding ironed out, I hope :)

I completely agree with the anti-clockwise torque (torque on the left).
The 4.5 m is the average distance of the wood to the left of the pivot point to that pivont point
Now the right-hand side.

And if you want do do some checking of the way you obtain your answer: have the support in the center and check that the person has to be 5m from the right end of the plank.
 
:)
 
gcombina said:
I did mg x length
[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 9.0 m ) = FL

And this way did NOT work

I had to change it to

[ (90N)(9.8) ] ( 4.5 m ) = Fl
Right, so you want to know why the second is correct?
If all of the mass of the 9m of plank were at 9m from the fulcrum then of course the torque would be 90*9*9.8. But it is spread evenly from zero distance to 9m. If you think of the plank as made of mass elements ##\rho dx## at distance x, the torque of an element is ##\rho x dx##. On average, an element is at distance 4.5, so treat it as though the whole mass is at that distance.

Now, as BvU said, let's move on the the other side of the equation. You had that wrong in the OP, as I mentioned in my first comment of post #2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K