Please confirm that I am right

  • Thread starter Thread starter lo2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation x^2 + 4x + y^2 + y + 4 = 0 needs to be rewritten in the standard form of a circle. The correct transformation leads to the center at coordinates (-2, -½) and a radius of 1. However, there are mistakes in the calculations, particularly in the last step involving (y + ½)². The discussion emphasizes that making mistakes is a part of the learning process, and practicing can help avoid repeating errors. Understanding these concepts is essential for mastering the material.
lo2
We have got:

x^2+4x+y^2+y+4=0

Which we have to rewrite so that it becomes the formula of the circle and then determine the coordinates of the center of the circle and the radius.

So I do the following:

x^2+4x+y^2+y+4=0 \Leftrightarrow x^2+4x+4+y^2+y+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}\Leftrightarrow (x+2)^2+(y+\frac{1}{2})^2

Then the center has got the following coordinates (-2,-½) and the radius is \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

The book however says something diffrent but am I right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lo2 said:
We have got:

x^2+4x+y^2+y+4=0

Which we have to rewrite so that it becomes the formula of the circle and then determine the coordinates of the center of the circle and the radius.

So I do the following:

x^2+4x+y^2+y+4=0 \Leftrightarrow x^2+4x+4+y^2+y+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}\Leftrightarrow (x+2)^2+(y+\frac{1}{2})^2

Then the center has got the following coordinates (-2,-½) and the radius is \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}

The book however says something diffrent but am I right?
.5 times .5 does not equal .5, so that answer can not be right.
 
lo2 said:
x^2+4x+y^2+y+4=0 \Leftrightarrow x^2+4x+4+y^2+y+\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}\Leftrightarrow (x+2)^2+(y+\frac{1}{2})^2

You made a mistake in the last step. Check again what's
(y+\frac{1}{2})^2.

And you forgot to write the equal sign in the last step.
 
I am a n00b. Why do I make such stupid mistakes those are mistakes that n00bs would make. I just cannot stand making such stupid mistakes please someone help me get rid of the n00bness.
 
Screwing up is a good thing in this case. Just learn from your mistakes, so you don't make `m again. Practice a lot so you can make lots of mistakes to learn from. The difference between n00b and and someone who's mastered the material is that the master has already made all the mistakes in the past, so he doesn't make them again.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top