Please help me understand where I went wrong in my conversion from Cartesian to polar coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter shp
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion from Cartesian to polar coordinates, specifically focusing on the calculation of partial derivatives. The user attempts to express the partial derivatives with respect to ρ and φ in terms of x and y but encounters confusion regarding the correctness of their approach. Key errors identified include the omission of the partial derivative with respect to ρ, which is crucial for accurate transformation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the chain rule in multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus concepts, particularly partial derivatives.
  • Familiarity with Cartesian and polar coordinate systems.
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus.
  • Study the transformation equations between Cartesian and polar coordinates.
  • Practice calculating partial derivatives in both Cartesian and polar systems.
  • Explore examples of common errors in coordinate transformations and their corrections.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with coordinate transformations and require a deeper understanding of partial derivatives in multivariable contexts.

shp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I need to convert z component of angular momentum operator (in quantum mechanics) Lz from cartesian to polar coordinates
Relevant Equations
L_z = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi}
I have done this:
1748716260135.webp
I can't clearly understand where I went wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would start from \begin{split}<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \rho} &amp;= \frac{\partial x}{\partial \rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial y}{\partial \rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \\<br /> &amp;= \cos \phi \frac{\partial }{\partial x} + \sin \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \\<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi} &amp;= \frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \\<br /> &amp;= -\rho \sin \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \rho \cos \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial y}<br /> \end{split} and solve for \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi} in terms of \frac{\partial}{\partial x} and \frac{\partial}{\partial y}.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and shp
pasmith said:
I would start from \begin{split}<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \rho} &amp;= \frac{\partial x}{\partial \rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial y}{\partial \rho}\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \\<br /> &amp;= \cos \phi \frac{\partial }{\partial x} + \sin \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \\<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi} &amp;= \frac{\partial x}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial y}{\partial \phi}\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \\<br /> &amp;= -\rho \sin \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial x} + \rho \cos \phi \frac{\partial}{\partial y}<br /> \end{split} and solve for \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi} in terms of \frac{\partial}{\partial x} and \frac{\partial}{\partial y}.
Thanks for help. But I wanted to know where I went wrong. Seems like (I) and (ii) is wrong. But I can't understand why.
 
shp said:
I can't clearly understand where I went wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
A partial derivative with respect to rho must also be included into equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K