Acceleration Questions: Answers to Solve Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyxaprilxyx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving acceleration problems in physics, specifically converting units and applying formulas. The first question involves calculating the time it takes for a car to accelerate from 55 mi/h to 60 mi/h at a rate of 0.60 m/s², requiring unit conversion to meters per second. The second question clarifies how to derive acceleration from the equation (30 m/s - 10 m/s)/2.0 s = 10 m/s², emphasizing the importance of unit consistency. The final question seeks to find time using the equation (30 m/s - 10 m/s)/T = 10 m/s², which is solved by rearranging the equation to isolate T. Overall, the discussion highlights the necessity of unit conversion and understanding basic physics formulas for acceleration.
xyxaprilxyx
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions here... I hope you'll bare with me.

1)A certain car is capable of accelerating at a rate of +.60 m/s^2. How long does it take for his car to go from a speed of 55 mi/h to a speed of 60 mi/h?

can someone please explain to me the step by step way to solve something like this? I don't expect you to solve it for me.. but atleast help me with the formula or equations I need.


2)...if I have an equation such as...
(30m/s - 10m/s)/2.0s = 10m/s^2 (this equation came from the book example)how did the answer get to 10m/s^2 ? I forgot how to.. can someone please enlighten me?

3)...if I have 10m/s^2 and (30m/s -10m/s)only..as in
(30m/s - 10m/s)/?= 10m/s^2 how can I solve to find the 2.0s? Please help...:frown:

Thanks in advance...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"1)A certain car is capable of accelerating at a rate of +.60 m/s^2. How long does it take for his car to go from a speed of 55 mi/h to a speed of 60 mi/h?"

The problem with this is that it involves two completely different systems of units. You need to either convert "m/s^2" to "mi/hr^2" or convert mi/h to m/s. Probably the latter is easier. There are, if I remember correctly, 0.62 miles per km so .62 miles per 1000 m or 1000 m per .62 mi= 1000/.62= 1613 meters per mile. That is: 55 mi/h= 55*1613= 88710 m/h and 60 mi/h= 60*1613= 96775 m/hr.
There are 60 minutes per hour and 60 seconds per minute so 3600 seconds per hour. At 55 mi/h, we would be going 88710/3600= 24.6 m/s and, at 60 mi/h, 96775/3600= 26.9 m/s.
Now the problem is "How long does it take to accelerate from 24.6 m/s to 26.9 m/s if the acceleration is 0.60 m/s^2?" That's a change in speed of 26.9- 24.6= 2.3 m/s. Acceleration is "change in speed divided by time" so we are saying 2.3/T= .60 (T is the time in seconds). That is the same as T= 2.3/.6= 4.3 seconds.

"2)...if I have an equation such as...
(30m/s - 10m/s)/2.0s = 10m/s^2 (this equation came from the book example)how did the answer get to 10m/s^2 ? "

Didn't you ask this question in a different forum? There are two things going on here: I take it that the "arithmetic" part-
(30- 10)/2= 20/2= 10 is not the difficulty. It may be keeping track of the units- do that pretty much the way you do numbers: Adding or subtracting the same units keeps them the same (and you CAN'T add or subtract different units!) and multiplying or dividing, use "fraction" rules: m/s divided by s is the same as (m/s)(1/s)= m/s^2.

"3)...if I have 10m/s^2 and (30m/s -10m/s)only..as in
(30m/s - 10m/s)/?= 10m/s^2 how can I solve to find the 2.0s?"

At first I didn't see any difference between this and the previous question! It should be easy to reduce the numerator: 30m/s- 10m/s= 20 m/s. Now the equation is (20m/s)/T= 10 m/s^2. With an equation like "A/x= B", you should think "multiply on both sides by x to get rid of that fraction" so that A= Bx. Now divide by B on both sides so that x is alone: x= A/B. In this problem A= 20 m/s and B= 10 m/s^2
(and x is T of course). A/B= (20 m/s)/(10 m/s^2). 20/10= 2 certainly. (m/s)/(m/s^2) is the same as (fractions: to divide, invert and multiply) (m/s)(s^2/m) or (m/m)(s^2/s)= s:
T= (20m/s)/(10m/s^2)= 2.0 s.
 
Thanks...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top