MATLAB Plotting Reaction Rate vs Temperature with MATLAB

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how to plot the reaction rate as a function of temperature using MATLAB, utilizing fusion cross-section data obtained from the EXFOR website. The user confirms that they have sigma and E values, which are essential for the integration process. It is clarified that the average temperature (T) relates to the energy spectrum of nuclei in plasma. Participants emphasize the need for a table of cross-section values rather than just a plot, as raw data is necessary for accurate calculations. The distinction between evaluated cross sections and differential cross sections is highlighted, noting that if the data is not in differential form, adjustments may be needed. A correction is made regarding the treatment of cross sections, stating that they are always evaluated at "E" and that the flux can vary with E. The user also inquires about editing a previous post for accuracy.
Rhony
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I know how to get fusion cross section plots from the exfor website but now I need to plot the reaction rate as a function of temperature. According to the image, I have sigma and E values as x and y data. How do I integrate using matlab .
I know how to get fusion cross section plots from the exfor website but now I need to plot the reaction rate as a function of temperature. According to the image, I have sigma and E values as x and y data. How do I integrate using MATLAB .
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    1.2 KB · Views: 206
Physics news on Phys.org
It would seem this is a MATLAB numerical integration problem.

So one has a nuclear (nuclei) energy spectrum, and I assume T is the average temperature (related to <E>) of the nuclei in the plasma. Is this correct?
 
Yes that's correct. I had got pb11 cross section data points from exfor. Now using maxwellian conditions, I wanted to use those to plot reaction rate. Its done in many textbooks where the explain the difference between cross section and reaction rate, but they never mention the steps followed.
 
Do you have a plot of the cross sections, or a table of the cross section values? You will need the table of values.
If you only have the plot, check the website again to see if there is a way to download the raw data.

Next, check to see if the cross sections are evaluated at "E", are are they differential cross sections as a function of E? (sigma(E)). I've seen it both ways.
If they are not differential cross sections, you will need to divide the cross section by the appropriate "delta-E" to put it in differential form.

Now you have:
  • Values of sigma(E)
  • T is a constant value
  • You can evaluate E*exp()
It is just a matter of performing the numerical integration.
 
rpp said:
Do you have a plot of the cross sections, or a table of the cross section values? You will need the table of values.
If you only have the plot, check the website again to see if there is a way to download the raw data.

Next, check to see if the cross sections are evaluated at "E", are are they differential cross sections as a function of E? (sigma(E)). I've seen it both ways.
If they are not differential cross sections, you will need to divide the cross section by the appropriate "delta-E" to put it in differential form.

Now you have:
  • Values of sigma(E)
  • T is a constant value
  • You can evaluate E*exp()
It is just a matter of performing the numerical integration.
I just realized my last post was incorrect, and I don't see a way to edit it. The cross sections are always going to be evaluated at "E", you should never have to divide by "delta-E". It is the flux that can be a function of E. Sorry for the confusion.

Mentors: is there a way to edit my previous post?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top