Point charges on equilateral triangle no idea what's wrong.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net electrostatic force on a charge in an equilateral triangle configuration. The user correctly calculated the force between two charges but struggled with the vector components when adding the force from a third charge. The confusion stemmed from using the wrong angle for the unit vector from the third charge to the first. The correct angle should be 150 degrees instead of 120 degrees, which affects the resultant force calculation. This adjustment leads to a more accurate answer that aligns with the book's solution.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



These are really frustrating because they seem so simple, I work them all out without a hitch only to find that I'm wrong half the time and left wondering why.

In fig 21-26a, particles 1 and 2 have charge 20 microcoulombs each and are held at separation distance d = 1.5 meters.

(1 is located above 2)

a.) What is the magnitude of the electrostatic force on 1 due to 2?
b.) Particle 3 is also of charge 20 microcoulombs and is placed to the right-center of 1 and 2, forming an equilateral triangle with 1 and 2. Find the net electrostatic force on 1 due to 2 and 3.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The first part, I have correct.

F = kq_{1}q_{2}r^{-2} = (8.99x10^{9})(20x10^{6})(20x10^{6})(1.5)^{2} = 1.6 N

The second part, I do not have correct.

Since the magnitude of the force from 2 is 1.6 N and it is located below 1, the vector of the force is just 1.6j.

Since the particles make an equilateral triangle, every angle is 60*. Since 3 is to the right, the positive angle to 1 from 3 is 120*.

Therefore the unit vector that points from 3 to 1 is cos(120)i + sin(120)j.

Since the magnitude of force from 3 to 1 is also 1.6, the vector of the force due to 3 is:

1.6cos(120)i + 1.6sin(120)j = -.8i + 1.38j

Adding the j components, the vector of all force on 1 is:

-.8i + 2.98j which has a magnitude of roughly 3.09 Newtons.



The book answer is 2.77. I don't even understand how their result makes sense. 2 and 3 are purely additive, they are both below 1 and 2 has no x component while 3 does.

Help? TIA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, 1MileCrash. 120o??
 
Was my explanation poor?
 
I just wanted you to focus on the 120o. I don't think 120o is the angle you want for constructing the unit vector from 3 to 1. I'm sure you've drawn a sketch, but you might look at it again.
 
Nevermind, I get you!

It's not 120* because I was subtracting the full 60 from 180 when I should only be subtracting half of that 60 from 180, to get 150. Right?
 
Try it and see :wink:
 
Fair enough, thank you sir!
 
Back
Top