Points on two ellipses with identical tangent lines

ZippyDee
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm trying to get this working for a program I'm making. I've been working on this for a while, but I can't seem to figure it out.

I have multiple rotated ellipses. Imagine you took a rubber band and stretched it around the ellipses. The rubber band would follow the curve of the outside of an ellipse until it reached a point on the ellipse whose tangent line was the same as the tangent line of another point on the next ellipse. What I need to figure out is where those points are.

For each ellipse, I know: center x, center y, semimajor axis, semiminor axis, and the amount by which it has been rotated. So any ellipse E has known variables x, y, a, b, and theta.

I don't have equations for the ellipses, all I have are those variables.

How do I go about solving this?

Thanks in advance!
-Zippy Dee
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I assume you can write the cartesian equation of the ellipse (if you don't, I'll explain it in the next post). This is of the form

A_1x_1^2+B_1y_1^2+C_1x_1y_1+D_1x_1+E_1y_1+F_1=0 (1)

and the same for the other ellipse:

A_2x_2^2+B_2y_2^2+C_2x_2y_2+D_2x_2+E_2y_2+F_2=0 (2)

where all the A,B,... are known numbers.

Now write another two equations:

2A_1x_1(x-x_1)+2B_1y_1(y-y_1)+C_1x_1(y-y_1)+C_1y_1(x-x_1)+D_1(x-x_1)+E_1(y-y_1)=0

and the same for the second one:

2A_2x_2(x-x_2)+2B_2y_2(y-y_2)+C_2x_2(y-y_2)+C_2y_2(x-x_2)+D_2(x-x_2)+E_2(y-y_2)=0

If you collect terms, you can write the last two equations as

y=G_1x+H_1

and for the second one

y=G_2x+H_2

Now put

G_1=G_2 (4)

and

H_1=H_2 (3)

You have to solve the system composed of equation (1), (2), (3), (4). You will get the four unknowns x_1, y_1, x_2 and y_2. Typically (but not always) you will find four 4-uples of solutions.
 
Thank you. That makes a lot of sense! However, I am not sure how to write the Cartesian equations for the ellipses. Could you explain how to do that?
 
ZippyDee said:
Thank you. That makes a lot of sense! However, I am not sure how to write the Cartesian equations for the ellipses. Could you explain how to do that?

Start vriting the canonical equation of an ellipse centered at the origin and "unrotated":

\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=1

Then rotate it (clockwise) by the angle theta. This means you have to do the transformation

x\rightarrow x\cos\theta-y\sin\theta
y\rightarrow x\sin\theta+y\cos\theta

i.e.:

\frac{(x\cos\theta-y\sin\theta)^2}{a^2}+\frac{(x\sin\theta+y\cos\theta)^2}{b^2}=1

And finally, put the center of the ellipse in the right place:

x\rightarrow x+x_C
y\rightarrow y+y_C

that is,

\frac{[(x+x_C)\cos\theta-(y+y_C)\sin\theta]^2}{a^2}+\frac{[(x+x_C)\sin\theta+(y+y_C)\cos\theta]^2}{b^2}=1

(I won't expand this for you! :mad:)

Other questions? o:)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top