Polar coordinates and mechanics question.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a bead on a rotating rod, where the motion is described using polar coordinates. The key equations include Newton's second law and the relationships between the radial and angular components of motion. Participants clarify the notation used, particularly the derivatives and the meaning of variables like ω and θ. The solutions derived relate to the vector R, which can be expressed in terms of sine, cosine, and exponential functions due to the nature of its second derivative. Overall, the conversation highlights the confusion surrounding the derivation process and the need for clearer explanations in class.
In_Development
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Alright, the problem here is that I seem unable to grasp an example given in class. I am not sure if this is due to not copying it down correctly, or if there's something I am just missing. Either way, I know I am not the only one who has had a bit of trouble with this. I'm hoping that someone with a greater knowledge of physics can spot what is going on.

Homework Statement


Bead threaded on a smooth rod (i.e. no friction) which rotates with constant angular velocity \omega about one end. Investigate the motion.

Where r is a radial vector,

\dot{r}=0, \dot{\theta}=\omega, and r=r_{0} at t=0

The dot above the letters and symbols, as far as I am aware, just denotes the first derivative (in case this isn't a standard notation of some sort). Also, the subscript doesn't seem to be working in the preview, so in case it does not turn out right, that is meant to be a subcript zero, not r^0. It's just denoting a particular distance up the rod that the bead is.

Homework Equations


Now this is the working out that I copied.

Newtons second law:
\ddot{r} -r\dot{\theta}^2 = 0.

(I realize Newton's second law should include a multiplication by mass, but I'm just writing the information I have). r dot dot is the second derivative I believe.

The Attempt at a Solution



\theta = \omegat

\dot{\theta} = \omega ; \ddot{r} = \omega*r^{2}

Solutions:
e^wt and e^-wt

Oh, the omega is not meant to be superscript throughout the question by the way, I don't know why it is; and the w in the 'solution' represents an omega. So it is e to the power of omega*time.

All I need to know is what on Earth the solutions are for and how did they materialise?

EDIT: I really made a mess of this whole latex thing.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ω=omega θ=theta, r' = dr/dt, r'' = d^2r/dt^2 (second derivative) Let R be the vector , and r be the length.
I'm not sure how you got to Newton's second law but here's how my professor proved it:
R can be broken down into x and y components as such:
R = rcosθ*i + rsinθ*j (i,j, are unit vectors along x and y)

Let's take the derivative twice (Keep in mind that this is with respect to t)
R' = -rsinθ*θ'*i + rcosθ*θ*'j
R'' = -rcosθ*θ'^2*i - rsinθ*θ'^2*j

Hey! That looks like our original R almost:
R'' = -Rθ''
R'' + Rθ'^2 = 0 <---matches your notes except for the sign..
Keep in mind that θ' = ω so:
R'' + R(ω^2) = 0

I haven't taken differential equations and I'm guessing you haven't either. But in general if you want to solve for R but you know that its second derivative is itself times a constant, then there are only a few functions that do that: sine, cosine, and e^x. You "guess" that the solution is e^ωt. If you take the derivative twice, indeed, it is itself times a constant (ω^2).

The solutions are for R. Sorry I don't know why I had issues with the signs, but they should be right otherwise.
 
Anadyne said:
Let ω=omega θ=theta, r' = dr/dt, r'' = d^2r/dt^2 (second derivative) Let R be the vector , and r be the length.
I'm not sure how you got to Newton's second law but here's how my professor proved it:
R can be broken down into x and y components as such:
R = rcosθ*i + rsinθ*j (i,j, are unit vectors along x and y)

Let's take the derivative twice (Keep in mind that this is with respect to t)
R' = -rsinθ*θ'*i + rcosθ*θ*'j
R'' = -rcosθ*θ'^2*i - rsinθ*θ'^2*j

Hey! That looks like our original R almost:
R'' = -Rθ''
R'' + Rθ'^2 = 0 <---matches your notes except for the sign..
Keep in mind that θ' = ω so:
R'' + R(ω^2) = 0

I haven't taken differential equations and I'm guessing you haven't either. But in general if you want to solve for R but you know that its second derivative is itself times a constant, then there are only a few functions that do that: sine, cosine, and e^x. You "guess" that the solution is e^ωt. If you take the derivative twice, indeed, it is itself times a constant (ω^2).

The solutions are for R. Sorry I don't know why I had issues with the signs, but they should be right otherwise.

Ah thanks for the help, because my professor gave no explanation whatsoever on how he got from one step to the other.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top