Ponctual electric charge problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving two point charges, q1 and q2, and the search for a third charge's position where the net force is zero. The initial calculations incorrectly applied Coulomb's law, leading to a flawed quadratic equation. Key errors identified include the incorrect denominator in the second term and the sign of the force from q2, which should be negative. After corrections, the position of the third charge is suggested to be at 0.750 meters, but discrepancies remain in the calculations. The thread highlights the importance of careful application of physical laws in solving electrostatic problems.
fishingspree2
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, my answer on the following problem is wrong and I don't see why. I am translating the question from another language, I am sorry if the english is not clear.

Let q1 = 27C localised at x=0, and another charge q2=3C localised at x=1 meters.

a)Besides infinity, find a point where the net force exerced on a third ponctual charge would be = 0.

Solution:
The third charge must be located between q1 and q2 so the forces exerted cancel out.
If is the distance between q1 and the third charge, then 1-d is the distance between q2 and the third charge. Let qx be the third charge.

Then by Coulomb's law:
0=\frac{kq_{x}q_{1}}{d^{2}}+\frac{kq_{x}q_{2}}{1-d^{2}}
k and qx cancel out, we now have
0=27-54d+30d^{2}
This equation has no solution.

However, if we look at things intuitevely, there must be a point where the forces cancel out. the answer is x=0,750 meters.
What is wrong?
Sorry for my english
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fishingspree2 said:
Then by Coulomb's law:
0=\frac{kq_{x}q_{1}}{d^{2}}+\frac{kq_{x}q_{2}}{1-d^{2}}
Two errors here:
(1) The denominator in the second term should be (1-d)^2, not 1-d^2.
(2) The sign of the second term must be negative, since the field from q2 points to the left.
 
From your Coulomb equation I get d^2(q2) = -(1 - d^2)q1 = q1d^2 - q1(1m)

(q2 - q1)d^2 = -q1(1 m)

-24d^2 = -27(1 m)

d^2 = 27/24 = 9/8

d = 3/2*sqrt(2)

It doesn't match your answer, so maybe I messed up. HOWEVER the point of my post is that, your quadratic equation is clearly wrong. Where did you get the d term from?

EDIT: Okay, so DocAl pointed out where the mistake was...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top