What Are Population I and Population II Stars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter randa177
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Population I stars are the youngest, metal-rich stars, including the Sun, primarily found in the thin disk of the Milky Way, and they formed from gas enriched by supernovae. In contrast, Population II stars are older, low-metallicity stars located mainly in the halo of the Milky Way, with little interstellar gas or dust present. The distinction between these populations is based on their metallicity and spatial distribution, with Population I stars associated with ongoing star formation and Population II stars linked to earlier stellar generations. The cutoff for metallicity between the two populations is debated, typically considered to be around 0.1% to 1%. Understanding these differences is crucial for studying the formation and evolution of galaxies.
randa177
Messages
90
Reaction score
1
Can anybody explain to me what a Pop. I object is?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The youngest stars, including the Sun, that have the highest metal content, are known as Population I stars.
 
I guess you answered your own question...

Anyway, the Population I/II distinction is fairly arbitrary, but is based on an apparent bimodality in the metallicity distribution of the Milky Way. Pop I objects probably formed later than Pop II objects and were therefore made from gas that had already been polluted with a lot of heavy metals (mainly by supernovae). This type of star dominates the thin disk of the Milky Way, while the halo is dominated by Pop II objects.
 
Some discussions on Pop I and Pop II objects/stars, what they are and where they are:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/starlog/pop12.html

http://www.astro.umd.edu/educationalresources/astro/mw/pop.html

http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/~smyers/courses/astro12/L21.html#pop

http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~dhw/Intro/lec17.html
astronomy.osu.edu said:
17.4 POPULATION I
The two stellar populations differ from each other in spatial distribution, age, and composition.

Features of Population I:
• occurs in disk
• old and young stars
• open clusters (and isolated/binary stars)
• roughly solar metallicity
[typical composition 70% hydrogen, 28% helium, 2% metals]

Associated with Population I:
• interstellar gas and dust
• star-forming gas clouds
• Type II supernovae

17.5 POPULATION II

Features of Population II:
• occurs in spheroid, especially the stellar halo
• old stars only (no blue main sequence stars)
• globular clusters (and isolated/binary stars)
• low metallicity, 1/1000 to 1/100 solar
[typical composition 75% hydrogen, 24.99% helium, 0.01% metals]

Associated with Population II:
• very little interstellar gas or dust
• no star formation
• only Type I supernovae
So where is the cutoff between Pop I and Pop II in terms of metallicity? 0.1% or 1% metals?

Interesting how Pop I stars are associated with Type II SN and Pop II stars are associated with Type I SN.

How Population I and II relate to Galaxies - http://www.astro.psu.edu/users/kluhman/a1/lec25.html

Milky Way Spiral Structure - http://www.seds.org/messier/more/mw_arms.html

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-build_image?bg=%23FFFFFF&/seri/AJ.../0062/600/0000146.000&db_key=AST&bits=4&res=100&filetype=.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top