Porsche challenges a Honda acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zhalfirin88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
In a race between a Porsche and a Honda, the Porsche accelerates at 3.5 m/s² while the Honda accelerates at 3.0 m/s², giving the Honda a 50-meter head start. The calculations involved setting up equations for acceleration, velocity, and distance over time for both vehicles. After integrating the equations, it was determined that the Porsche wins the race. However, it was pointed out that the acceleration expressions used were incorrect, as they should be constant rather than time-dependent. The discussion concluded that using kinematic equations could simplify the solution process.
Zhalfirin88
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Porsche challenges a Honda to a 400-m race. Because the Porsche's acceleration of 3.5m/s2 is larger than the Honda's 3.0m/s2, the Honda gets a 50-m head start. Both cars start accelerating at the same instant. Who wins?

The Attempt at a Solution


The only thing I'm not sure about is how to get the velocity from a given acceleration. How do you figure it out mathematically?

Edit: So basically I set up both things as a function of time, and I integrated.

Porsche: a(t) = 3.5t
Porsche: v(t) = (3.5/2)t^2
Porsche: s(t) = (3.5/6)t^3

Honda: a(t) = 3t
Honda: v(t) = (3/2)t^2
Honda: s(t) = (1/2)t^3 + 50

Using these formulas, I calculated that the Porsche wins! Does it look correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Zhalfirin88 said:
Edit: So basically I set up both things as a function of time, and I integrated.

Porsche: a(t) = 3.5t
Porsche: v(t) = (3.5/2)t^2
Porsche: s(t) = (3.5/6)t^3

Honda: a(t) = 3t
Honda: v(t) = (3/2)t^2
Honda: s(t) = (1/2)t^3 + 50

your expressions for a(t) are wrong, they are constant and don't depend on time. So just redo the integration and find the time when the distance is 400m.
 


Okay thanks, the Porsche still won ^_^. But anyways, is that how you'd normally solve it? I'm pretty sure there are other ways but that just seemed like the easiest and first thing that I thought of.
 


Zhalfirin88 said:
Okay thanks, the Porsche still won ^_^. But anyways, is that how you'd normally solve it? I'm pretty sure there are other ways but that just seemed like the easiest and first thing that I thought of.

yes that is how you'd do it. Though instead of integrating you could have just used the direct result from the kinematic equation: s=1/2at2
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top