Position vs. Time graph equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 14K views
lcary
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I just completed a lab on the acceleration due to gravity and I have to answer a few questions about my data. Before I share what I am confused about I will give a quick run through of the lab procedures:

--First I used a spark timer to mark a strip of paper with a clamp attached to it and let the strip free fall. Then I measured the distance of each mark made from the spark timer with a 2m stick and made a distance vs time graph from the data. I made a best fit polynomial line of degree 2 and found the equation of the fit line that turned out to have the form ___x^2+___x+___, where the ___ is where my coefficients are. I multiplied the x^2 coefficient by 2 to get acceleration.

One of the lab follow up questions asked me why I multiply that coefficient by 2 to get acceleration and I am totally stumped.

Can someone explain why multiplying by 2 gives accel?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your polynomial fit, x represents time (independent variable) and position is y (dependent variable). You fitted coefficients a, b and c to the equation

y(t) = at2 + bt + c.

What kinematic equation gives y(t)? Compare the coefficients between what you know to be the case and what you fitted.