Positively Charged Particle in a Magnetic Field

AI Thread Summary
A positively charged particle enters a magnetic field directed out of the page, with its velocity oriented upward. The force acting on the particle can be determined using the equation F = Qv × B. According to the right-hand rule, the magnetic force on the particle is indeed directed horizontally to the right. The discussion clarifies a mix-up regarding the use of the left-hand rule, confirming that the right-hand rule is the correct convention. This highlights the importance of accurately applying the right-hand rule in physics problems involving magnetic forces.
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
In the attached figure (also at http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/3231/lorentz5sa.png" ) is a positively charged particle entering a magnetic field that points out of the page. The velocity of the particle is in the upward direction, orthogonal to the magnetic field.

My only question is, based on the equation \vec{F}=Q\vec{v}\times\vec{B}, am I correct to say that the force due to the magnetic field is horizontally to the right?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • lorentz.png
    lorentz.png
    6.8 KB · Views: 511
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
amcavoy said:
In the attached figure (also at http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/3231/lorentz5sa.png" ) is a positively charged particle entering a magnetic field that points out of the page. The velocity of the particle is in the upward direction, orthogonal to the magnetic field.

My only question is, based on the equation \vec{F}=Q\vec{v}\times\vec{B}, am I correct to say that the force due to the magnetic field is horizontally to the right?

Thank you.
yes, that's correct
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yes you can say that by using the left hand rule.
 
gem0688 said:
yes you can say that by using the left hand rule.
I am not sure if that was a typo or a joke, so just in case...
Amcavoy is correct by the standard convention which is the right hand rule.
 
Last edited:
JustinLevy said:
I am not sure if that was a typo or a joke, so just in case...
Amcavoy is correct by the standard convention which is the right hand rule.

soz, typo! :blushing: :redface:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top