Positively charged side with induced emf

AI Thread Summary
A solid conductor moving at 150 m/s through a 0.045T magnetic field raises questions about which side becomes positively charged and the induced emf. The right-hand rule is suggested as a method to determine the direction of force on the electrons within the conductor. As electrons are pushed to one side by the magnetic field, that side becomes negatively charged, while the opposite side becomes positively charged due to a deficit of electrons. Understanding the Lorentz force law clarifies that the side with fewer electrons is the positively charged side. The discussion concludes with a confirmation that this explanation is helpful in resolving the confusion.
VenaCava
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid conductor travels at 150 m/s across a uniform .045T magnetic field. Which side is positively charged and what is the emf across this block?


Homework Equations



I actually solved for the emf no problem. I am having difficulty determining which side is positively charged. There is a diagram which accompanies the question. It can be found in this pdf file (first question): http://pittmath.com/Physics12/Ultimate%20Induction%20Review%20Assignment.pdf

if you can't open it, the diagram simply shows a rectangular block with a velocity to the left going through a magnetic field going out of the page. The question asks if the positive side of the rectangle is the top or the bottom.


The Attempt at a Solution



I was told to use the right hand rule, but I'm not clear which one or even what I'm looking for.

If you could help that would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the Lorentz force law? (force in terms of charge, velocity, and magnetic field) I'd use that to determine the direction of force on the electrons in the metal. Remember that the direction of the cross product of two vectors is given by the right hand rule.
 
I think you lost me a little bit.
I don't understand what makes a side "positive." That's my main problem.
 
Well, think about what happens to the electrons in the metal. They are charged particles, moving through a magnetic field (not parallel to the field), so they will feel a force. That force will tend to push them toward one side of the metal bar. Now, since electrons are negatively charged, the side that the electrons are pushed toward will have more electrons than protons, so it will have a slight excess of negative charge. That's the negative side. The opposite side of the bar will be missing some electrons, so it will have a slight excess of positive charge. That's the positive side.

Does that make sense?
 
thank you that helped a lot.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top