Possible extinction event: nearby supernova

AI Thread Summary
A recent discussion centers on the hypothesis that a nearby supernova could have contributed to an extinction event at the end of the Devonian era, as detailed in a popular science article. The proposed mechanism involves a dual impact: an initial blast of ionizing radiation followed by a long-lasting radioactive cloud that could disrupt Earth's magnetosphere and harm life. Researchers suggest testing rock strata for isotopes like Samarium 146 and Plutonium 244 to support this theory, although distinguishing these results from those caused by meteor impacts poses significant challenges. Critics highlight the need for careful sampling and analysis to avoid biases in correlating isotopes with extinction events. The complexity of geological history and the potential for intense debate over findings underscore the difficulty of establishing a clear link between supernovae and extinction events.
jim mcnamara
Mentor
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,852
TL;DR Summary
The extinction event 359 mya that ended Devonian times may have been caused by a nearby supernova.
A popular science article on the end of the Devonian era examines the likelihood of an extinction event mediated by a nearby supernova.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200818142104.htm

Per the article -
A convincing argument can be made by finding Samarium 146 and/or Plutonium 244 isotopes in rock strata from that period.

The proposed model includes what the authors call a double whammy:
First a blast of ionizing radiation, then a massive radioactive cloud of ejecta that persists over a long period. Both which could alter the magnetosphere of Earth and allow the solar wind to damage extant flora and fauna. The latter cloud effect could persist over long periods. Which matches the known geologic record of a ~100000 year decline in species diversity at the end of the Devonian.

My takeaway is this looks like a great research project.

Gather rocks from several sites around the globe, test for those two isotopes that do not naturally occur on Earth. The most likely results will be either clearly negative or positive if the experiment is well designed. A positive result is sure to spark intense criticism of the experimental design. New findings are often generate that. The downside is Geology has a long and tortuous history of downright ugly debate.

Ruling out other causes for the presence of those two isotopes would be intense. Meteors.

Finding anomalous abundances of weird elements in rock layers often is the result of meteor impacts. They may need to be ruled out. Meteor impacts can create layers. Thin layers with odd isotopes or elements have been found and used to help prove other hypotheses. Example:

Iridium in the K-Pg (KT is the old name) boundary layer caused by the Chicxulub impact, which made life hard for the dinosaurs. This layer is high in Iridium, rare or non-existent in most Earth rock. It is sometimes called the Iridium Anomaly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous–Paleogene_boundary
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_anomaly
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
It is an interesting hypothesis, although it would be better to narrow it down to one particular event. In their paper, they are not distinguishing the Kellwasser event with the Hangenberg event (10 Myr separating them). Basically they are saying that their hypothesis could explain one of those events or even both. They should have stick with the Hangenberg event like it was suggested in previous papers.

Their paper: https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/08/17/2013774117
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and Evo
jim mcnamara said:
My takeaway is this looks like a great research project.

Gather rocks from several sites around the globe, test for those two isotopes that do not naturally occur on Earth. The most likely results will be either clearly negative or positive if the experiment is well designed. A positive result is sure to spark intense criticism of the experimental design. New findings are often generate that.
There is a huge volume of sedimentary rock near the surface of the Earth. Checking it randomly for exotic isotopes would be a very expensive process. Instead, mapping the contacts of formations that show a reduction in palaeontology, and analysing those for changes in exotic isotopes is a tractable project. But that is exactly what is done now, for example the Chicxulub Iridium.
 
  • Like
Likes Genava
Baluncore said:
There is a huge volume of sedimentary rock near the surface of the Earth. Checking it randomly for exotic isotopes would be a very expensive process. Instead, mapping the contacts of formations that show a reduction in palaeontology, and analysing those for changes in exotic isotopes is a tractable project. But that is exactly what is done now, for example the Chicxulub Iridium.
The problem is that this presupposes the conclusion.
You should check the sedimentary rocks for changes in exotic isotopes that show no accompanying extinctions, too.
 
snorkack said:
The problem is that this presupposes the conclusion.
You should check the sedimentary rocks for changes in exotic isotopes that show no accompanying extinctions, too.
If you are trying to correlate exotic isotopes with extinction events, you should sample the extinction horizon, along with the profile immediately before and immediately after. That will provide the necessary control.

The extinction event in a sedimentary section can be identified using a binary search for the step change in palaeontology. That comes naturally to a geologist walking out a formation, or examining the core from a drill hole. The same is not true of exotic isotopes that appear as a pulse in the section. Exotics cannot be easily seen while walking up stream beds, ascending rocky ridges, or climbing cliff faces.

It is not feasible to sample and analyse all candidate sections for a pulse of exotics that will probably be less than one millimetre thick. A one kilometre thick stratigraphic section would require one million samples. Some of those samples may contain exotic isotopes from meteorites that are local, not regional or worldwide. It would be impossible to find the exact same age strata, in different rock types in different locations, without the help of fossil evidence. If there is no extinction, then you have no reliable calendar.

You could reduce the analysis processing cost by bulking the milli-samples into one metre mixed samples, but there is nothing to say the exotic layer would be present in any of the samples, or in the section. Random sampling will blow your budget long before you get any usable data.
 
We have little shade but plenty of wind on my property. The upshot of this is that I have to be judicious in how/where I put up shade-creating barriers in various places around my property to maximise shade without unduly large windage. My property is an irregular polygon and not aligned with the cardinal axes, so it is not easy to tell where the shade will be at a given time. For example, I have put up an umbrella next to our pool, but it can only shade the southish-side of the pool, and...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
These last days, there is a seemingly endless cluster of rather powerful earthquakes close to the islands of Santorini, Amorgos, Anafi, and Ios. Remember, this is a highly volcanically active region, Santorini especially being famous for the supervolcanic eruption which is conjectured to have led to the decline of the Minoan civilization: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minoan_eruption To grasp the scale of what is happening, between the 26th of January and the 9th of February, 12000...
Back
Top