Possible Magnitudes for Resultant Vector

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasMagnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the possible magnitudes of the resultant vector when adding two vectors of 3.5m and 4.5m. The maximum magnitude occurs when the vectors are aligned, totaling 8.0m, while the minimum magnitude occurs when they are in opposite directions, resulting in a minimum of 1.0m. The values 7.0m, 3.5m, and 0.5m are examined, with 0.5m being identified as impossible based on the vector addition principles. A graphical method is suggested to visualize the resultant vector's possible lengths. Ultimately, the conclusion is reached that the magnitude of the resultant vector cannot be 0.5m.
ThomasMagnus
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
Two vectors whose magnitudes are 3.5m and 4.5m, respectively, are added together. Which of the following cannot be the magnitude of the resultant vector.

A) 0.5m
B)1.0m
C)3.5m
D)7.0m


Here's what I tried

2 situations: if the vectors are in the same direction:
3.5m+4.5m=8.0m

If in opposite directions:

3.5+(-4.5)=-1.0--->magnitude is 1.0
(-3.5)+4.5=1.0

Where are 7.0, 3.5, and 0.5 coming from??


Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solve this problem graphically. Draw a vector 4.5 cm long. Draw another vector 3.5 cm long on another scrap of paper. Lay the tail of the 3.5 cm vector on the head of the 4.5 cm vector so they form a straight line of length 8 cm. The angle between the vectors is 180 degrees. Rotate the 3.5 cm vector around the head of the 4.5 cm vector varying the angle from 180 degrees to 0 degrees. observe the distance from the head of the 3.5 cm vector and the tail of the 4.5 cm vector. You will find all of the above distances but one.
 
Aha! Thank you.

I found that the vector length can be anything between 8and1
 
then a is the answer?
 
correct
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top