Potential difference given velocity of electron at 2 points

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an electron moving through an electric field, with its speed changing from 2900 m/s to 1500 m/s. Participants are discussing how to calculate the potential difference between the two points based on the change in kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between kinetic energy and potential difference, questioning the sign of the charge of the electron and its impact on the calculation. Some are discussing the need for precision in the answer and the significance of significant figures.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the calculations and assumptions involved in determining the potential difference. Some participants have provided guidance on the interpretation of signs and significant figures, while others are clarifying the relationship between work and potential difference.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the homework system may have specific requirements for significant figures, leading to confusion about the expected precision of the answer. There is also a mention of the system rejecting certain answers, which may indicate constraints on acceptable formats or values.

louza8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron moves through an electric field, and its speed drops from 2900 {\rm m/s} to 1500 {\rm m/s} .

What's the potential difference between the two points at which the speed was measured?

Homework Equations


U=qV
K=mv^2/2

q=electron
m=mass of electron

The Attempt at a Solution



Ki=.5 * 9.109*10^-31 * 2900^2
= 3.83*10^-24J
Kf=.5 * 9.109*10^-31 * 1500^2
=1.0247*10^-24J
deltaK=2.80557*10^-24

p.d= deltaK/q
= 2.80557*10^-24/1.602*10^-19C
=1.8*10^-5V

Is it supposed to be negative 1.602*10^-19C for the charge on the electron and is that what is stuffing me up? Onto my final go of this on the online homework so trying to get it :)

Thanks for help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe your method looks correct. But the negative sign does not really matter, as your change in KE would be negative so your pd would still be positive.
 
Damn the homework already said no to the answer 1.8*10^-5V and 1.7*10^-5V :'(

Maybe it doesn't like V and wants J/C I don't know :(
 
hi louza8! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
louza8 said:
Ki=.5 * 9.109*10^-31 * 2900^2
= 3.83*10^-24J

oooh … it's not 24 :redface:

EDIT: oops! yes it is 24 :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you need a more precise answer like 1.75. If the homework system you are using is something like UTexas, 3 decimals are needed as they only tolerate 2% error.
 
Last edited:
rock.freak667 said:
I believe your method looks correct. But the negative sign does not really matter, as your change in KE would be negative so your pd would still be positive.
Energy conservation gives you ΔU=-ΔK, so ΔU>0. ΔV=ΔU/q should be negative.

The OP should also verify he or she has the right number of sig figs.
 
To verify, the correct number of sig figs are 2, deduced from the question. or are they 3? whoops? confused.
 
Last edited:
The speed drops so ΔK is negative. The work of the field is negative.

ehild

Edit: I left out one sentence before, saying that the potential difference was positive. :blushing: Work is negative p.d. times charge. It is electron, so the p.d. is negative. -1.751 *10-5 V
 
Last edited:
The potential difference is not the work per unit charge done by the field; it's the work per unit charge that would have to be done against the field to move it between two points.

Negative charges are a bit confusing because they want to roll up potential hills. But here, the electron is slowing down, so it's ending up at a lower potential (but higher potential energy) than from where it started. The potential difference is therefore negative.
 
  • #10
thanks guys, the answer given from mastering physics was 1.75*10^-5V. they were asking for the deltaV.

I don't know why they answered in 3 significant figures when only 2 are provided in the question? am I missing something here?
 
  • #11
No. You are not missing anything. When carrying out sig figs, it really should be two but many systems use three automatically.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K