Potential difference given velocity of electron at 2 points

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the potential difference between two points where an electron's speed changes from 2900 m/s to 1500 m/s. The kinetic energy at both speeds is calculated using the formula K=mv²/2, resulting in a change in kinetic energy (ΔK) of 2.80557 x 10^-24 J. The potential difference (p.d.) is determined using the equation p.d = ΔK/q, yielding a value of -1.751 x 10^-5 V when considering the charge of the electron as -1.602 x 10^-19 C. The final answer provided by the homework system was 1.75 x 10^-5 V, emphasizing the importance of significant figures in the calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy calculations using K=mv²/2
  • Familiarity with electric potential and potential difference concepts
  • Knowledge of charge of an electron, specifically -1.602 x 10^-19 C
  • Ability to apply conservation of energy principles in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about energy conservation in electric fields
  • Study the implications of significant figures in physics calculations
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy
  • Investigate the behavior of charged particles in electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and energy conservation, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to potential difference and kinetic energy calculations.

louza8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron moves through an electric field, and its speed drops from 2900 {\rm m/s} to 1500 {\rm m/s} .

What's the potential difference between the two points at which the speed was measured?

Homework Equations


U=qV
K=mv^2/2

q=electron
m=mass of electron

The Attempt at a Solution



Ki=.5 * 9.109*10^-31 * 2900^2
= 3.83*10^-24J
Kf=.5 * 9.109*10^-31 * 1500^2
=1.0247*10^-24J
deltaK=2.80557*10^-24

p.d= deltaK/q
= 2.80557*10^-24/1.602*10^-19C
=1.8*10^-5V

Is it supposed to be negative 1.602*10^-19C for the charge on the electron and is that what is stuffing me up? Onto my final go of this on the online homework so trying to get it :)

Thanks for help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe your method looks correct. But the negative sign does not really matter, as your change in KE would be negative so your pd would still be positive.
 
Damn the homework already said no to the answer 1.8*10^-5V and 1.7*10^-5V :'(

Maybe it doesn't like V and wants J/C I don't know :(
 
hi louza8! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
louza8 said:
Ki=.5 * 9.109*10^-31 * 2900^2
= 3.83*10^-24J

oooh … it's not 24 :redface:

EDIT: oops! yes it is 24 :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Perhaps you need a more precise answer like 1.75. If the homework system you are using is something like UTexas, 3 decimals are needed as they only tolerate 2% error.
 
Last edited:
rock.freak667 said:
I believe your method looks correct. But the negative sign does not really matter, as your change in KE would be negative so your pd would still be positive.
Energy conservation gives you ΔU=-ΔK, so ΔU>0. ΔV=ΔU/q should be negative.

The OP should also verify he or she has the right number of sig figs.
 
To verify, the correct number of sig figs are 2, deduced from the question. or are they 3? whoops? confused.
 
Last edited:
The speed drops so ΔK is negative. The work of the field is negative.

ehild

Edit: I left out one sentence before, saying that the potential difference was positive. :blushing: Work is negative p.d. times charge. It is electron, so the p.d. is negative. -1.751 *10-5 V
 
Last edited:
The potential difference is not the work per unit charge done by the field; it's the work per unit charge that would have to be done against the field to move it between two points.

Negative charges are a bit confusing because they want to roll up potential hills. But here, the electron is slowing down, so it's ending up at a lower potential (but higher potential energy) than from where it started. The potential difference is therefore negative.
 
  • #10
thanks guys, the answer given from mastering physics was 1.75*10^-5V. they were asking for the deltaV.

I don't know why they answered in 3 significant figures when only 2 are provided in the question? am I missing something here?
 
  • #11
No. You are not missing anything. When carrying out sig figs, it really should be two but many systems use three automatically.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K