Potential difference in a simple circuit with transistor

AI Thread Summary
Understanding potential difference in a circuit with a transistor involves recognizing that the base-emitter junction behaves like a diode, typically around 0.7V. The potential difference across R1 can be calculated using the formula VR1 = Ibase x R1, while for R2, knowing the collector current (derived from the base current and the transistor's gain, HFE) allows for the calculation of VR2 = Icollector x R2. It's important to note that the voltage across R2 cannot exceed the supply voltage minus the saturation voltage of the transistor. The values for potential differences across R1 and R2 are not fixed and depend on the circuit's configuration and current flow. Designing such circuits typically involves selecting supply voltage and current values to determine appropriate resistor values.
Adi Hafiz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone..I have some difficulties in understanding the potential difference in a circuit with a transistor. Kindly refer to the picture provided. I understood that potential difference across Ry can be obtained from the formula in the picture. The potential difference across Rx plus Ry will be the same as V because I picture it as being parallel to the battery. Please correct me if I'm wrong. But what I would really like to know is how to find potential difference of R1 and R2? Is there any rules that I have to follow? One more thing is it necessary to put R1 in that circuit? I hope someone can answer my questions because I really like to know the answer. http://i.imgur.com/5eI0VkD.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Adi Hafiz said:
Hello everyone..I have some difficulties in understanding the potential difference in a circuit with a transistor. Kindly refer to the picture provided. I understood that potential difference across Ry can be obtained from the formula in the picture. The potential difference across Rx plus Ry will be the same as V because I picture it as being parallel to the battery.

That is correct if you make the assumption that the base current (in R1) is small compared to the current through Rx and Ry. You could make Rx and Ry small compared to R1 so this assumption is valid.

Adi Hafiz said:
what I would really like to know is how to find potential difference of R1 and R2?

For R1... The base -> emitter of a transistor behaves like a diode so the base voltage will be about 0.7V. You know the voltage at the other end of R1 so you can calculate the voltage difference by subtraction.

For R2... This is harder. If you know the voltage across R1 you can calculate the current flowing through R1 into the base (eg the base current). If you know the gain (HFE) of the transistor you can work out the collector current by multiplying the base current by HFE. Once you know the collector current you can work out the voltage drop across R2.

There are a few complications...

There is a limit on the voltage drop across R2. The collector voltage cannot fall below the saturation voltage of the transistor (perhaps 0.3V). So the drop across R2 cannot be greater than the supply voltage - 0.3V.

The gain of a transistor HFE isn't very well characterised. In other words it varies from transistor to transistor due to manufacturing tolerance. A typical small transistor might have a gain that is specified to be..

min 20
typ 100
max 200

This means the voltage on R2 might vary depending on how good the transistor is. In digital switching circuits it might not be a problem (you could just assume the minimum value). In analogue circuit this problem is typically avoided by including feedback in the design but that's a topic for later when you understand the basics.
 
  • Like
Likes Adi Hafiz and davenn
Thanks for the reply CWatters. So from your explanation I conclude that there are no fixed values for potential difference across R1 and R2. It depends on the current I guess? R1 depends on base current and R2 depends on emitter current? Can i use formula V=IR to calculate the potential difference in this case?

VR1=Ibase x R1

VR2=Icollecter x R2
 
Adi Hafiz said:
Thanks for the reply CWatters. So from your explanation I conclude that there are no
fixed values for potential difference across R1 and R2.

No that's not really what I meant. I'm struggling to answer the question because I don't know the context to the circuit. Where did it come from? What do you think it does? It has no inputs or outputs, nothing is changing so why shouldn't the voltage on R1 and R2 be fixed?

It looks like it might be part of a linear amplifier and I assumed that in my earlier description. In that case it would be normal to choose values for the supply voltage Vcc, the collector and base current and work back to values for R1 and R2.
 
Adi Hafiz said:
Can i use formula V=IR to calculate the potential difference in this case?

VR1=Ibase x R1

VR2=Icollecter x R2

The short answer is yes. Although normally when you design a circuit like this those voltages are known and you are trying to calculate what R1 and R2 should be.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top