Potential difference metallic sphere

In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of electric potential difference using the TOTAL influence theorem and the convention of defining the zero level as the potential at infinity. The formula used for the potential at the surface of a uniformly charged sphere is also mentioned. The conversation also includes a humorous anecdote about Van de Graaff and his interest in rockets.
  • #1
Guillem_dlc
184
15
Homework Statement
A metallic sphere of radius ##R=3,0\, \textrm{cm}## is located concentrically inside a spherical crust also metallic of inner radius ##R_i=10\, \textrm{cm}## and outer radius ##R_e=12\, \textrm{cm}##. The sphere has a charge ##Q_1=+1,2\, \textrm{nC}## and the clean charge of the crust is ##Q_2=+6\, \textrm{nC}##. Calculate:
a) The charge on the inner and outer surfaces of the crust.
b) Sphere potential and crustal potential (consider ##V_\infty=0##)
The bark is then connected to the ground. Calculate:
c) The charge of the sphere and that of the outer and inner surfaces of the crust.
d) Sphere potential and crustal potencial.

Sol: a) ##Q_{2i}=-1,2\, \textrm{nC}##; ##Q_{2e}=+7,2\, \textrm{nC}##
b) ##V_{\textrm{crustal}} = 540\, \textrm{V}##; ##V_{\textrm{sphere}}=790\, \textrm{V}##
c) ##Q_1=+1,2\, \textrm{nC}##; ##Q_{2i}=-1,2\, \textrm{nC}##; ##Q_{2e}=0##
d) ##V_{\textrm{crustal}}=0##; ##V_{\textrm{sphere}}=250\, \textrm{V}##
Relevant Equations
Total influence theorem (a)
4C8B6D8D-E20F-45BB-9D06-84F38BA31F72.jpeg

a) We know that ##Q_1=1,2\, \textrm{nC}## and ##Q_2=6\, \textrm{nC}##. By the TOTAL influence theorem:
$$-Q_1=Q_{2i}=-1,2\, \textrm{nC}$$
$$Q_2=Q_{2i}+Q_{2e}\rightarrow Q_{2e}=7,2\, \textrm{nC}$$

b) Electric potential difference crust:
$$V_A-V_\infty=$$
How was this potential difference thing going?
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Guillem_dlc said:
How was this potential difference thing going?
Not quite sure what you are asking. What formula would you normally use for the potential at the surface of a uniformly charged sphere, charge Q radius r?
Potentials are relative. What convention does the formula assume wrt the zero potential?
 
  • #3
haruspex said:
Not quite sure what you are asking. What formula would you normally use for the potential at the surface of a uniformly charged sphere, charge Q radius r?
Potentials are relative. What convention does the formula assume wrt the zero potential?
There, I remember how I did it. What do you mean by convention?
 
  • #4
Guillem_dlc said:
There, I remember how I did it. What do you mean by convention?
Please quote the formula you are using.
 
  • #5
ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_de_Graaff_generator

Just anecdotal, and hopefully humorous ##-## my grandfather was a litte older than Van de Graaff, and they were friends ##-## VdG (5 years old at the time) was interested in rockets, and one day he saw a car accelerating rapidly down the street, and he observed the exhaust pipe, and he asked Grandpa "how does that little pipe push that car so fast", and Grandpa explained to him that/how it wasn't the thrust from the exhaust pipe that gave the impetus to the car ##\dots##
 
Last edited:
  • #6
haruspex said:
Please quote the formula you are using.
b) Crust:
$$V_A-V_\infty=-\int_\infty^A E\, dl=-\int_\infty^A E\, dr=$$
$$=-\int_\infty^A kQ_1+Q_2\dfrac{1}{r^2}\, dr=+\left( \dfrac{k(Q_1+Q_2)}{R_e}\right)=540\, \textrm{V}$$

Sphere: ##V_C-V_\infty =(V_C-V_B)+\overbrace{(V_A-V_\infty)}^{=540}##
$$V_C-V_B=-\int_B^C E\, dr=-\int_B^C \dfrac{kQ_1}{r^2}\, dr=-\left[ kQ_1\left( \dfrac{1}{R_1}-\dfrac{1}{R_i}\right) \right]=$$
$$=250\, \textrm{V} \rightarrow V_C-V_\infty =790\, \textrm{V}$$
 
  • #7
Guillem_dlc said:
b) Crust:
$$V_A-V_\infty=-\int_\infty^A E\, dl=-\int_\infty^A E\, dr=$$
$$=-\int_\infty^A kQ_1+Q_2\dfrac{1}{r^2}\, dr=+\left( \dfrac{k(Q_1+Q_2)}{R_e}\right)=540\, \textrm{V}$$

Sphere: ##V_C-V_\infty =(V_C-V_B)+\overbrace{(V_A-V_\infty)}^{=540}##
$$V_C-V_B=-\int_B^C E\, dr=-\int_B^C \dfrac{kQ_1}{r^2}\, dr=-\left[ kQ_1\left( \dfrac{1}{R_1}-\dfrac{1}{R_i}\right) \right]=$$
$$=250\, \textrm{V} \rightarrow V_C-V_\infty =790\, \textrm{V}$$
Ok, so in each case what you have calculated is a difference from ##V_\infty##.
Strictly speaking, voltage is always a matter of potential difference. There is no absolute potential.
A common convention is to define the zero level as the potential at infinity. That is not always applicable, e.g. in analysing infinite charged plates, but it is fine where all the charges are in a bounded region. You are instructed to use that convention here. Hence ##V_\infty=0##.

Does that answer your question or have I misunderstood?
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
  • #8
haruspex said:
Ok, so in each case what you have calculated is a difference from ##V_\infty##.
Strictly speaking, voltage is always a matter of potential difference. There is no absolute potential.
A common convention is to define the zero level as the potential at infinity. That is not always applicable, e.g. in analysing infinite charged plates, but it is fine where all the charges are in a bounded region. You are instructed to use that convention here. Hence ##V_\infty=0##.

Does that answer your question or have I misunderstood?
That's it. Thank you very much.
 

1. What is potential difference in a metallic sphere?

Potential difference in a metallic sphere refers to the difference in electric potential between two points on the surface of the sphere. It is a measure of the amount of work needed to move a unit of electric charge from one point to another within the sphere.

2. How is potential difference calculated in a metallic sphere?

Potential difference in a metallic sphere can be calculated by dividing the difference in electric potential between two points on the surface of the sphere by the distance between those points. This can be represented by the equation V = ΔV/d, where V is the potential difference, ΔV is the difference in electric potential, and d is the distance between the points.

3. What factors affect potential difference in a metallic sphere?

The potential difference in a metallic sphere is affected by the amount of charge on the sphere, the distance between the two points of measurement, and the material of the sphere. The potential difference will also vary depending on the type of circuit and the presence of any external electric fields.

4. How does potential difference relate to electric current in a metallic sphere?

Potential difference is directly related to electric current in a metallic sphere. A higher potential difference will result in a higher electric current, while a lower potential difference will result in a lower electric current. This is because the potential difference is what drives the flow of electric charge through the metallic sphere.

5. Why is potential difference important in a metallic sphere?

Potential difference is important in a metallic sphere because it is a key factor in determining the flow of electric current. It is also used to calculate the resistance of the sphere and can help determine the efficiency of the circuit. Additionally, potential difference is important in understanding the behavior of electric fields and their effects on the sphere.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
907
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
5K
Back
Top