Potential difference of a group of atoms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of an electron trapped in a potential well, specifically addressing its kinetic energy and potential energy when interacting with a photon. The term "trapped" refers to the electron being in a potential well, analogous to a ball in a bowl, where it can move but requires sufficient energy to escape. Clarification is sought on potential differences, with the understanding that distance between charges affects potential energy, not just their proximity. Additionally, the conservation of kinetic energy and momentum is questioned, with the realization that energy can be transformed into other forms, such as thermal energy, during collisions. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and energy conservation principles.
HuaYongLi
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I encountered a question in my book:

a)An electron is trapped in a solid between a group of atoms where the potential is +2.8V
The de Broglie wavelength of this electron is 1.2nm. Calculate
i) its speed
ii) its kinetic energy
iii) the sum of its kinetic energy and its potential energy
b)i) Calculate the energy of a photon of wavelength 650nm
ii)State and explain whether or not the electron in part a) can escape from this group of atoms as a result of absorbing this photon

I can do the whole question via formulae "taught" to me and find that the resolved kinetic energy after the photon absorption will result in it escaping.

But I have some problems with the question itself, it says the electron is "trapped". I would have thought since it is trapped it was stationary.

Also I do not understand what is trying to get across when it mentions "potential", is this the potential that the electron needs to cross to escape?

I don't think I fully understand potential differences, would placing 2 opposite charges far from each other and close together result in the same potential difference and consequently the same KE? I always thought that placing 2 charges away from each other no matter the distance (Electromagnetic force has infinite range) would attract each other, closing the distance and also increasing the force.

I thought that momentum and KE are both conserved in a closed system. Say you had 2 particles of equal opposing momentums and you collided them both so they both stopped.
Particle 1 - 0.5kg - 1 m/s
Particle 2 - 1kg - 0.5m/s
But Particle 1 has a KE of 0.25J
and Particle 2 has a KE of (relatively) 0.125J
0.25-0.125=0.125J
If both particles are now stationary, where has the extra KE gone when KE is also meant to be conserved?

A lot of questions here, sorry.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HuaYongLi said:
But I have some problems with the question itself, it says the electron is "trapped". I would have thought since it is trapped it was stationary.

Also I do not understand what is trying to get across when it mentions "potential", is this the potential that the electron needs to cross to escape?
"Trapped" means it's in some sort of potential well. Think of a ball rolling around in a bowl--it can be moving, but unless it has enough kinetic energy it can't get out of the bowl. In this case though the potential isn't gravitational but electric.

I don't think I fully understand potential differences, would placing 2 opposite charges far from each other and close together result in the same potential difference and consequently the same KE? I always thought that placing 2 charges away from each other no matter the distance (Electromagnetic force has infinite range) would attract each other, closing the distance and also increasing the force.
Two charges that are far apart have a greater potential than two (of the same magnitude) that are close together. I'm not exactly sure what your confusion is here.

I thought that momentum and KE are both conserved in a closed system. Say you had 2 particles of equal opposing momentums and you collided them both so they both stopped.
Particle 1 - 0.5kg - 1 m/s
Particle 2 - 1kg - 0.5m/s
But Particle 1 has a KE of 0.25J
and Particle 2 has a KE of (relatively) 0.125J
0.25-0.125=0.125J
If both particles are now stationary, where has the extra KE gone when KE is also meant to be conserved?
I'm not sure this corresponds to a physical situation. In real life, two masses can collide and stick together, but the energy probably goes into thermal motion of the molecules that make up the objects (or into surrounding air molecules), so the temperature goes up. If your two particles are electrons, for instance, then I think that they would have to be deflected and they couldn't stick together.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top