How Is Electric Potential Calculated for a Curved Rod?

  • Thread starter Thread starter exitwound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Rod
AI Thread Summary
Electric potential for a curved rod is calculated using the formula V=kQ/r, where k is the Coulomb's constant, Q is the charge, and r is the distance from the charge. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly defining the length of the rod as R·φ, where R is the radius and φ is the angle in radians. The integral of the potential along the arc leads to the conclusion that V can be simplified to V=KQ/R. A common point of confusion is understanding why the length of the arc is expressed as R·φ, which is clarified by the definition of circular arcs. The discussion emphasizes the need for careful attention to these definitions to avoid mistakes in calculations.
exitwound
Messages
291
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



problem.jpg


Homework Equations



V=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



V=kQ/r
dV=kdQ/r

dQ=\lambda d\theta <---This is where I'll make a mistake if any.

dV=k(\lambda d\Theta) /r
V=\frac{k\lambda}{r}\int_0^{\phi}d\Theta
\phi=2\pi/3
\lambda=Q/L= Q/(2\pi/3)

V=k\frac{3Q}{2\pi r}\int_0^{\phi}d\Theta


...so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yerr, that is a mistake. You forgot that the length of the rod is R\cdot \phi and not just \phi.

dq=\lambda dl=\lambda R \cdot d\theta
\lambda \equiv \frac{Q}{R\cdot\phi}

dV=\frac{K}{R}\cdot dq

dV=\frac{K}{R}\cdot\lambda R \cdot d\theta

dV=K\lambda\cdot d\theta

dV=\frac{KQ}{R\cdot\phi}\cdot d\theta

And now it's just a question of taking the integral along the arc and you're done.

The surprising result I got is that the potential is just V=\frac{KQ}{R}
 
Last edited:
See, that is where I knew I'd make a mistake. I can't understand why it's <br /> R\cdot \phi. No problems I've found online explain it either. Where does the R come from?
 
exitwound said:
See, that is where I knew I'd make a mistake. I can't understand why it's <br /> R\cdot \phi. No problems I've found online explain it either. Where does the R come from?

Just by definition. The length of a circular arc of radius R resting on x radians is R\cdotx

Just like how a circle of radius R has a circumference of 2\pi R, that's the same as saying you've got a circular arc of radius R resting on 2\pi radians.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top