Potential Energy and gravitation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the role of the gravitational constant (G) in equations related to gravitational force and potential energy. The equation F=G m1m2/R^2 describes the force between two masses, while U=mgh represents gravitational potential energy. The negative sign in U=-Gxm1xM2/r+K indicates that gravitational potential energy decreases as two masses come closer together. The gravitational acceleration formula g=-GM/r^2xr_hat also uses -G to signify the attractive nature of gravity. Overall, G serves as a conversion factor, and its negative sign is a convention reflecting the attractive force of gravity.
shounakbhatta
Messages
287
Reaction score
1
Hello,

Can someone please explain me:

F=G m1xm2/R^2

In potential energy U=mgh

Generally it is also written that:

U=-Gxm1xM2/r+K. How -G comes into play?

Also Newton's above law of Gravitation in vector form is written as:

F_12=-Gm1m2/r12^2 r12

Here also how -G comes into play?

Coming to Gravitation acceleration:
If one of the masses is larger than the other, gravitational field is defines as:

g=-GM/r^2xr_hat

How again -G comes into play?

If somebody can explain in a step by step method....


Thanks,

-- Shounak
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Upper-case G is the universal gravitational constant. It is basically just a conversion factor. It is negative by convention.
 
Hello,

What is the conversion factor?

Does that mean the equation for G and -G are the same?

-- Shounak
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top