Potential Energy and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculations of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy for a system of two blocks connected by a pulley. The change in gravitational potential energy when the 3.0-kg block drops 0.60 m is calculated to be -8.82 J, accounting for both blocks' movements. The kinetic energy is determined to be 8.82 J, which reflects the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy. The velocity of the 1.5-kg block is derived from the kinetic energy equation, but the relationship between the velocities of both blocks needs clarification. Overall, the calculations emphasize the importance of considering both masses in the energy transformations.
Manh
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks are hung by a string draped over a pulley, a 1.5-kg block on the left and a 3.0-kg block on the right. The two blocks start out at rest and at the same height.

A. What is the change in the gravitational potential energy of the system of blocks and Earth when the 3.0-kg block has dropped 0.60 m ?
B. What is the change in the kinetic energy of the system between release and this instant?
C. What is the velocity of the 1.5-kg block at this instant?

Homework Equations


U = m*g*h
K = 1/2 m*v^2

The Attempt at a Solution


A. U = (3.0 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.60)
= 17.64 J
I wonder if the answer should have a negative sign!

B. K = 17.64 J
Since U is converted to K, therefore K has the same value of U. Am I correct?

C. 17.64 = 1/2*(1.5)*v^2
v = 4.85 m/s
These are my works and answers. I hope somebody can help me check them. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Manh said:
A. U = (3.0 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.60)
= 17.64 J
I wonder if the answer should have a negative sign!
Don't ignore the movement of the 1.5 kg mass. (As far as sign, when something lowers the change in gravitational PE is negative.)

Manh said:
B. K = 17.64 J
Since U is converted to K, therefore K has the same value of U. Am I correct?
Yes, but you have the wrong value. (See A.)

Manh said:
C. 17.64 = 1/2*(1.5)*v^2
v = 4.85 m/s
These are my works and answers. I hope somebody can help me check them. Thanks!
Realize that the total kinetic energy is for both masses.
 
Doc Al said:
Don't ignore the movement of the 1.5 kg mass. (As far as sign, when something lowers the change in gravitational PE is negative.)
A. U1 = (1.5 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(0.6 m) = 8.82 J
U2 = (3 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(-0.6 m) = -17.64 J
delta U = -17.64 J + 8.82 J = -8.82 J
Doc Al said:
Yes, but you have the wrong value. (See A.)
B. delta K = 8.82 J
Doc Al said:
Realize that the total kinetic energy is for both masses.
C. K = 1/2 m1*v1^2 + 1/2 m2*v2^2. Where K = 8.82 J. Is this correct?
 
Manh said:
C. K = 1/2 m1*v1^2 + 1/2 m2*v2^2. Where K = 8.82 J. Is this correct?
Yes, but what is the relationship between the two velocities?
 
wouldn't you end up with 2 variables v1 and v2?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top