Potential energy of a dipole point and point charge

hansbahia
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point dipole p is at the origin of coordinates, while a point charge q is at position r. Calculate the potential energy U of this system in two ways (a) by treating the dipole as a source and q as a test charge in the dipole field (b) by treating the dipole as a test-object in the Coulomb electric field of the point-charge, now treated as a source


Homework Equations


U=-pE
V(r)=Integral of Edr

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the potential

V(r)=p.r/(4πε0r^3)=p.r(hat)/(4πε0r^2)=pcosθ/(4πε0r^2)

Then I differentiated since E(r)=d/dr(V(r))

E(r)=-d/dr(V(r))=-d/dr(pcosθ/(4πε0r^2))=-(-3pcosθ/(4πε0r^3))=3pcosθ/(4πε0r^3)

So my U would be equal

U=-pE=-p(3pcosθ/(4πε0r^3))=-3p^2cosθ/(4πε0r^3) ?

It doesn't make sense
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, \vec{E}= -\nabla \Phi \ne -\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial r}.
Second, the energy of a charge q in potential V is U=qV.
Third, the energy of a dipole p in field E is U=-\vec{p}\cdot\vec{E}.
For part a, you're supposed to use a charge q in a dipole field.
For part b, you're supposed to use a dipole \vec{p} in point charge field.
 
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top