Potential energy of a particle in a system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the potential energy function U(x) for a particle influenced by a conservative force defined as F = (-Ax + Bx^6) î N. The correct potential energy function derived from this force is φ(x) = (A/2)x² - (B/7)x⁷ + C, where C is a constant. Participants also explored the changes in potential and kinetic energy as the particle transitions from x = 1.30 m to x = 3.60 m, emphasizing the relationship between force and potential energy through the gradient of φ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservative forces in physics
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Basic concepts of kinetic energy and energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of potential energy functions from force equations
  • Learn about the relationship between force and potential energy gradients
  • Explore energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Investigate the implications of conservative forces in multi-dimensional systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to potential energy and conservative forces.

Claudia Sanchez
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Warning! Posting template must be used for homework questions.
1. A single conservative force acting on a particle within a system varies as
Farrowbold.gif
= (− Ax + Bx6)ihat N, where A and B are constants,
Farrowbold.gif
is in Newtons, and x is in meters.
(a) Calculate the potential energy function U(x) associated with this force, taking U = 0 at x = 0.
(b) Find the change in potential energy and change in kinetic energy as the particle moves from
x = 1.30 m to x = 3.60 m.

2. I got Ax^2/2 - b^7/2 but it was wrong so I'm really confused on how to go about this problem

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential energy corresponding to force \vec{F} is a scalar function \phi(x,y) such that \nabla \phi= -\vec{F}. Of course, \nabla \phi is defined as \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}\vec{j}. But it is not clear to me what "F" is- is "N" a vector? If so, what vector?

If you mean that \vec{F}= (-Ax+ Bx^6)\vec{i} then we must have
\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}= Ax- Bx^6
\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}= 0.

From \partial \phi/\partial x= Ax- Bx^6, we have
\phi(x,y)= \frac{A}{2}x^2- \frac{B}{7}x^7+ p(y)
But then
\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}= p'(y)= 0
so that p(y) is actually a constant:
\phi(x, y)= \frac{A}{2}x^2- \frac{B}{7}x^7+ C
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi, thanks for the help! that was the same answer I got but it was wrong and I don't really understand what I'm supposed to do
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
6K