Potential from a ring of charge

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric potential at point P above a ring of charge, first drop a perpendicular from P to the center of the ring, creating a right triangle. The distance from the ring elements to point P can be expressed using this geometry. The electric field E due to the ring is calculated as E = kQ*OP'/(R^2 + OP'^2)^(3/2). The potential gradient along the perpendicular is determined by integrating the electric field over the distance from the center to point P. This approach allows for the calculation of the potential at point P based on the charge distribution of the ring.
-EquinoX-
Messages
561
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/3462/poth.th.jpg

How can I find the potential at the point p above?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no idea where to start at
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd suggest that you use geometry.

Drop a perpendicular to the plane of the ring. Call it P' The distance then is a right triangle that has one side constant, P-P'. Your dq element distances from P can then be determined by the distance expression of the elements of the ring in the x-y plane to P' and the other leg P-P'.
 
I don't quite understand what you mean.. please elaborate
 
Drop a perpendicular from p to the axis of the coil. Let PP' = x be the the perpendicular. Let O be the center of the coil and R be the radius of the coil. Electric field due to the coil having charge Q is given by
E = kQ*OP'/(R^2 + OP'^2)^3/2
The potential gradient along P'P is given by deltaV = E.dx = E*dx*cos(theta) = -E*dx*x/OP' .Substitute the value of E. Find the integration from x = 0 to x = x.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top