Potential of infinite sheet with thickness

susdu
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Describe the potential inside and outside an infinite insulating sheet with uniform density ρ and thickness d, as a function of x (distance from the center of the sheet). zero potential has been set at its center. What is the potential on the surface of the sheet?

Homework Equations



Potential and E.field definitions.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that inside the sheet (x<\frac{d}{2}) the field is given by

E=\frac{ρx}{ε_0}.

so, potential inside the sheet (with ##V_i=0## at ## x=0##) is:

##V_f=-\int^x_0 E\,ds=-\frac{ρx^2}{ε_0}##

similarly, outside the sheet (x>\frac{d}{2}) field is

E=\frac{ρd}{ε_0}.

however, I'm not sure about the expression for outside the sheet, is it

##V_f=-\int^\frac{d}{2}_0 E\,ds-\int^x_\frac{d}{2} E\,ds##

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would use the Gauss Law. Let's consider a cylindrical surface with it's axis perpendicular to the sheet that "sticks out" of the sheet equally. Gauss Law states, that:

\epsilon _0 E \int ds = Q

And Q=density of charge x volume.
From symmetry we know that there's no flux through the curved surface of the cyllinder, so we have flux only through bases of the cyllinder:

\epsilon _0 E 2\pi R^2 = \rho \pi R^2 d

So E=\frac{\rho d}{2\epsilon _0}

And E is constant everywhere outside the sheet.
 
I already know the expressions for E.field outside/inside the sheet.
I need an expression for potential.
 
susdu said:
##V_f=-\int^\frac{d}{2}_0 E\,ds-\int^x_\frac{d}{2} E\,ds##?
Looks right to me.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top