Potential of two parallel infinite wires

BenBa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two parallel infinite wires lay parallel to the z-axis in the xz-plane. One located at x=d has charge distribution λ and one located at x=-d has charge distribution -λ.


Homework Equations



a) Find the potential V(x,y,z) using the origin as a reference
b)Show that the equipotential surfaces are circular cylinders parallel to, but not coaxial with, the wires. For a given V_0 determine the corresponding axis and radius of the cylinder.

The Attempt at a Solution



I believe we can approach this problem with gaussian surfaces, but i am confused on how to exactly use the fact that the origin is a reference. Also the fact that its in cartesian is messing with my ability to do the problem, there is so much cylindrical symmetry...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe we can approach this problem with gaussian surfaces, but i am confused on how to exactly use the fact that the origin is a reference. Also the fact that its in cartesian is messing with my ability to do the problem, there is so much cylindrical symmetry...
Normally you'd do this problem for one wire, with the wire along the x-axis or similar.

This gives you an equation for the electric field about that axis.
What happens to that equation if the wire is not on the axis?

Hint: if a simple parabola were centered on the y-axis it would have equation ##y=x^2##, if it were now centered on the line x=d, it would have equation ##y=(x-d)^2##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top