Potential Step where E>V0. λ(II) always twice λ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZedCar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the focus is on a particle approaching a potential step where the energy (E) exceeds the potential height (V0). The user observes that the characteristic wavelength (λ) in region II is consistently twice that of region I across multiple problems. This raises a question about whether this relationship is inherent to such scenarios. The user speculates that if E is significantly greater than V, the differences in wavelengths should be negligible, while if E is close to V, reflection occurs. The inquiry suggests a deeper exploration of the mathematical relationships governing wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.
ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I have been attempting some questions on a particle approaching a potential step where

E>V0

I have the provided solutions for all the questions and I noticed that λ(II) is always twice the value of λ in all the questions.

Is there some inherent reason for this, and is it always the case with this type of problem?

Thank you.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What type of problem?

Assuming I and II are the regions before and after the step respectively, and λ is a characteristic wavelength of the wavefunction, so that k=2π/λ

If E >> V, the height of the step, then there should be almost no difference.
If E ~ V, then there should be some reflection off the edge of the step.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soluti...nergy_greater_than_step_height_.28E_.3E_V0.29

Perhaps the problem was set up numerically so that E=(4/3)V or something?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top