Power and Energy Problem-nothing too hard

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oscar Wilde
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Hard Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average power output of football players running up stadium stairs. The players ascended a 140m long incline at a 32-degree angle in 66 seconds, with a typical player mass of 95 kg. The initial calculation of height was incorrect, leading to an estimated power output of 1,252 W, while the correct value is around 1,000 W. Clarification revealed that the 140m length is the hypotenuse, not the adjacent side, which is crucial for accurate height determination. The participants emphasized the importance of visualizing the problem to avoid such errors in future calculations.
Oscar Wilde
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"During workout, the football players at (insert generic college here) ran up the stadium stairs in 66 seconds. The stairs are 140m long and inclined at an angle of 32 degrees. If a typical player has a mass of 95 kg, estimate the average power output on the way up. Ignore friction and air resistance."

Homework Equations



w= Fd p= w/t maybe law of sin/cos perhaps p=Fv might be useful, i doubt it change in energy/time=power

The Attempt at a Solution



use law of sines to calculate that the change in height in roughly 87 meters.

Change in energy/time=power= ( 95kg*87m*10m/s^2)/(66s)=1,252 W

The correct answer was 1,000 W, and I am very frustrated. This is one of the few questions in the chapter I cannot answer. Please help, feedback appreicated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you made an error in your change in height calculation. Otherwise it looks like you're doing the problem correctly. I'm getting about 1050 W for an answer.

sin(32 deg) = (h / 140m)
 
Thanks! So the given "length" of the stairs is actually the hypotenuse rather than the adjacent side to the angle 32 degrees?
 
Correct, the 140m is the hypotenuse. To help visualize it, you could draw it out on a graph, the positive x-axis being 0 deg. Then you can clearly see the x-component and the y-component (height), and the right triangle that these 3 lengths form.
 
Thanks a lot I appreciate it, quite flustering to have something as simple as that throw off your entire solution.

Many thanks
 
No problem, and don't worry about it, it happens! At least it's cleared up.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top