Power generated by this current source

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating power generated by a current source using Kirchhoff's laws. The initial calculations yield a current of 6 A and a voltage of -10 V, resulting in a power output of -60 W. There is a noted typo in the voltage equation, where it should be V1 = 6 + VS instead of V1 = 6 - VS. Participants agree that the negative power output is valid and reflects the nature of the circuit. The consensus confirms that the calculations, aside from the typo, are correct and the negative power indicates a specific behavior of the circuit.
Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
In the circuit of the figure knowing that ##V_0=10\, \textrm{V}## determine ##V_S## and the power generated by the source ##J##.

Sol: ##V_S=-4\, \textrm{V}##, ##P_J=60\, \textrm{W}##
Relevant Equations
Kirchoff law
Figure:
23A885B4-BAB7-4136-A8B5-E41AE9D621D3.jpeg


My attempt at a solution:
84508BD0-3987-4E87-9F9A-AA0473393DF2.jpeg

1st kirchoff law:
$$J=2I_0+I_0=6\, \textrm{A}$$
EE6EE0EC-F7AE-4323-82FC-68CD127D6552.jpeg

$$V_1+8=10\rightarrow \boxed{V_1=2}$$
$$V_1=6-V_S\rightarrow \boxed{V_S=-4\, \textrm{V}}$$
We are looking for ##P## generated in ##J##
$$V_J=V_1-2\cdot J=2-2\cdot 6=-10\, \textrm{V}$$
20EBEE76-621B-493E-A2AC-A686ED0D0932.jpeg

$$\boxed{P_{\textrm{gen}}=(V_J-0)J=-10\cdot 6=-60\, \textrm{W}}$$
Wouldn't this exercise do like this? I have tried it but the power is negative.
 

Attachments

  • 73FF17CA-ACF9-47F4-9F37-B1A8EFC75219.jpeg
    73FF17CA-ACF9-47F4-9F37-B1A8EFC75219.jpeg
    33.6 KB · Views: 132
  • 0CEBF2A5-4724-484F-9EAA-AF8C12256E83.jpeg
    0CEBF2A5-4724-484F-9EAA-AF8C12256E83.jpeg
    16.7 KB · Views: 141
Physics news on Phys.org
Your ##V_1=6-V_S## should be ##V_1=6+V_S##, but it looks like that was just a typo.
The rest looks right. I would not rule out the possibility that the answer is negative.
 
haruspex said:
Your ##V_1=6-V_S## should be ##V_1=6+V_S##, but it looks like that was just a typo.
The rest looks right. I would not rule out the possibility that the answer is negative.
Is it negative?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
Is it negative?
As I wrote, your working looks fine, apart from that typo. So unless I am missing something the answer is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top