Power generated by this current source

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating power generated by a current source using Kirchhoff's laws. The initial calculations yield a current of 6 A and a voltage of -10 V, resulting in a power output of -60 W. There is a noted typo in the voltage equation, where it should be V1 = 6 + VS instead of V1 = 6 - VS. Participants agree that the negative power output is valid and reflects the nature of the circuit. The consensus confirms that the calculations, aside from the typo, are correct and the negative power indicates a specific behavior of the circuit.
Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
In the circuit of the figure knowing that ##V_0=10\, \textrm{V}## determine ##V_S## and the power generated by the source ##J##.

Sol: ##V_S=-4\, \textrm{V}##, ##P_J=60\, \textrm{W}##
Relevant Equations
Kirchoff law
Figure:
23A885B4-BAB7-4136-A8B5-E41AE9D621D3.jpeg


My attempt at a solution:
84508BD0-3987-4E87-9F9A-AA0473393DF2.jpeg

1st kirchoff law:
$$J=2I_0+I_0=6\, \textrm{A}$$
EE6EE0EC-F7AE-4323-82FC-68CD127D6552.jpeg

$$V_1+8=10\rightarrow \boxed{V_1=2}$$
$$V_1=6-V_S\rightarrow \boxed{V_S=-4\, \textrm{V}}$$
We are looking for ##P## generated in ##J##
$$V_J=V_1-2\cdot J=2-2\cdot 6=-10\, \textrm{V}$$
20EBEE76-621B-493E-A2AC-A686ED0D0932.jpeg

$$\boxed{P_{\textrm{gen}}=(V_J-0)J=-10\cdot 6=-60\, \textrm{W}}$$
Wouldn't this exercise do like this? I have tried it but the power is negative.
 

Attachments

  • 73FF17CA-ACF9-47F4-9F37-B1A8EFC75219.jpeg
    73FF17CA-ACF9-47F4-9F37-B1A8EFC75219.jpeg
    33.6 KB · Views: 129
  • 0CEBF2A5-4724-484F-9EAA-AF8C12256E83.jpeg
    0CEBF2A5-4724-484F-9EAA-AF8C12256E83.jpeg
    16.7 KB · Views: 137
Physics news on Phys.org
Your ##V_1=6-V_S## should be ##V_1=6+V_S##, but it looks like that was just a typo.
The rest looks right. I would not rule out the possibility that the answer is negative.
 
haruspex said:
Your ##V_1=6-V_S## should be ##V_1=6+V_S##, but it looks like that was just a typo.
The rest looks right. I would not rule out the possibility that the answer is negative.
Is it negative?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
Is it negative?
As I wrote, your working looks fine, apart from that typo. So unless I am missing something the answer is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top