Power of Energy Transfer: Solving a 3D Vector Problem

AI Thread Summary
To solve the power of energy transfer in the given problem, the dot product of the force and velocity vectors must be calculated. The equation p = F·v is applicable, where F is the force vector and v is the velocity vector. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the multiplication of these three-dimensional vectors, suggesting that the dot product is the correct method to use. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding vector operations in component notation. Ultimately, the correct calculation will yield the power value from the provided options.
eraemia
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object moves with a velocity of [4 m/s,-1 m/s, 3 m/s] and is acted on by a force of [-5 N, 0, +5 N]. What is the power of the energy transfer in this interaction?

a. -35 W
b. -5 W
c. 0
d. +5 W
e. +35 W

Homework Equations



p = Fv

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I'm trying to find p, and I'm given Fv, and I know that p = Fv. The problem is that it's invalid to multiply these two matrices. So what do I do? I don't know how to multiply these two three-dimensional vectors? What do I need to do first?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eraemia said:

Homework Statement



An object moves with a velocity of [4 m/s,-1 m/s, 3 m/s] and is acted on by a force of [-5 N, 0, +5 N]. What is the power of the energy transfer in this interaction?

a. -35 W
b. -5 W
c. 0
d. +5 W
e. +35 W

Homework Equations



p = Fv

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I'm trying to find p, and I'm given Fv, and I know that p = Fv. The problem is that it's invalid to multiply these two matrices. So what do I do? I don't know how to multiply these two three-dimensional vectors? What do I need to do first?

Have you learned about how to take the dot product between two vectors in component notation? I suspect that's the approach you're expected to take, given the choice of these vectors in three dimensions... (BTW, P = F·v is a better way to write the equation for this sort of problem.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top